Undergrad Do These Probability Conditions Imply Independence of Events A, B, and C?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the independence of three events A, B, and C, given specific probability conditions. The first condition, P((A ∩ B) ∪ C) = P(A) * P(B) * P(C), raises questions about whether A, B, and C can be independent. Participants note that if A, B, and C are independent, certain equations can be derived, but they also suggest that the equations might hold due to coincidence if the events are not independent. The conversation touches on the implications of events with zero probability and the acceptance of such events within the probability space. Ultimately, the independence of A, B, and C remains uncertain under the proposed conditions.
Patt
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone.
Let us consider 3 events A,B,C such that: $$P((A \cap B )\cup C)=P(A)*P(B)*P(C)$$ Notice that the second term is a union and not an intersection. Are they independent? And what if the assumption was: $$P(A \cap( B \cup C))=P(A)*P(B)*P(C)$$? I know that the independence condition requires us to check whether the probability of the intersection of each pair factorizes plus the probability of the intersection of all of them factorizes as well. But I do not know how to prove that they are/they are not independent Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
If all A,B and C are independent
P((A\cap B)\cup C)=1-(1-P(A)P(B))(1-P(C))=P(A)P(B)+P(C)-P(A)P(B)P(C),
P(A\cap (B\cup C))=P(A)[1-(1-P(B))(1-P(C))]=P(A)[P(B)+P(C)-P(B)P(C)] and of course
P(A\cap B \cap C)=P(A)P(B)P(C).

I have no idea how you made assumptions.
 
Last edited:
Patt said:
Hello everyone.
Let us consider 3 events A,B,C such that: $$P((A \cap B )\cup C)=P(A)*P(B)*P(C)$$ Notice that the second term is a union and not an intersection. Are they independent? And what if the assumption was: $$P(A \cap( B \cup C))=P(A)*P(B)*P(C)$$? I know that the independence condition requires us to check whether the probability of the intersection of each pair factorizes plus the probability of the intersection of all of them factorizes as well. But I do not know how to prove that they are/they are not independent Thank you.
My first thoughts are:

If A, B, C are independent, then you can get an equation for P(C) in terms of P(A) and P(B). So, under certain circumstances your equation would hold.

If A, B, C are not independent, then the equation may hold by an arithmetic coincidence and it should be possible to construct an example.

I don't see that either equation you quote demands that A, B, C be independent or not independent.
 
PS My second thought is that if A, B, C are independent, you can't get your equation to hold. It's impossible.
 
You could start expanding using ## P(A \cup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A \cap B)## and then see what happens if the three are independent.
 
PeroK said:
PS My second thought is that if A, B, C are independent, you can't get your equation to hold. It's impossible.
What about P(A)=P(B)=P(C) = 0 ?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
What about P(A)=P(B)=P(C) = 0 ?
But this brings up the old discussion of whether we accept/consider events of probability 0. Would they even be in the ( standard, afaik) sample space?
 
WWGD said:
But this brings up the old discussion of whether we accept/consider events of probability 0. Would they even be in the ( standard, afaik) sample space?

One of the axioms of probability is that ##\emptyset## is a set in the probability space and the measure of the empty set is zero.

We can also consider the case A = B = C with P(A) = 1.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
785
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K