Are these papers on Quantum Electrodynamics true?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of claims made by Kroll & Karplus regarding Quantum Electrodynamics and the credibility of the journal "Progress in Physics." Participants conclude that "Progress in Physics" is a predatory publisher, attempting to imitate the reputable journal "Reports on Progress in Physics." The lack of indexing in the Clarivate master journal list and absence of an impact factor further substantiate this claim. The forum emphasizes the unreliability of Vixra as a source, reinforcing the need for credible scientific references.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Electrodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with Feynman Diagrams
  • Knowledge of academic publishing standards
  • Awareness of predatory publishing practices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the criteria for identifying predatory journals
  • Explore the significance of Feynman Diagrams in quantum physics
  • Examine the impact factors of reputable scientific journals
  • Learn about the peer review process in academic publishing
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, academic publishers, and anyone interested in the integrity of scientific literature.

jonjacson
Messages
450
Reaction score
38
TL;DR
Did Kroll & Karplus really lied to us?
Physics news on Phys.org
jonjacson said:
Summary:: Did Kroll & Karplus really lied to us?

Are these critics valid?
Probably not. Progress in Physics is most likely a predatory publisher. Very often predatory publishers choose journal names that are similar to respected journals.

In this case “Progress in Physics” is trying to masquerade as “Reports on Progress in Physics” which is a well-known journal that is indexed and has a decent impact factor.

“Progress in Physics”, in contrast, does not even show up on the Clarivate master journal list and has not even been given an impact factor. The low response and deceptive title are indicative of predatory publishers.

This thread is closed. If you find a professional scientific reference on this topic please send me a PM with the reference and I can reopen the thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Demystifier and berkeman
jonjacson said:
Summary:: Did Kroll & Karplus really lied to us?
……
https://vixra.org/abs/2002.0011
The forum rules explicitly disallow Vixra as a source. It’s that unreliable (or more precisely, reliably bad).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, vanhees71, Demystifier and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 326 ·
11
Replies
326
Views
26K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K