MHB Are These Sets Vector Subspaces of R^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces Vector
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am trying to find if these two sets are vector subspaces of R^3.

\[V=\left \{ (x,y,z)\in R^{3}|(x-y)^{2}+z^{2}=0 \right \}\]

\[W=\left \{ (x,y,z)\in R^{3}|(x+1)^{2}=x^{2}+1 \right \}\]

In both cases the zero vector is in the set, therefore I just need to prove closure to addition and to scalar multiplication. Can you kindly assist ?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel,

Your analysis is off to a good start when you noted that $0 = (0,0,0)$ is a member of both sets. It is helpful to look at the equations to see if we can infer from them any information about these subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^{3}.$ In the case of $W$, for example, try filling in the details of the argument that allows us to conclude $x=0.$ From there it may be easier to establish/refute the remaining subspace properties we must check. Feel free to ask any follow up questions.
 
Thank you. I have managed to prove W is a subspace using your tip that x=0 (got it why it is). I can't prove the other set. Can't bring the condition to a simpler form.
 
Nicely done. Yes, $W$ is a linear subspace of $\mathbb{R}^{3}.$ To analyze $V$, note that each of the terms (thinking of $(x-y)$ as one term) is squared and that the sum of these two squared terms is zero. Can you conclude anything from thinking along these lines?
 
Oh...silly me. x-y = 0 and z=0.

So V is also a subspace, has to be then.
 
For W, the equation that must be satisfied does not involve y or z. $(x+ 1)^2= x^2+ 2x+ 1= x^2+ 1$ so 2x= 0 and x= 0. The problem is to show that the subset or $R^3$, \{(0, y, z)\}$, with y and z any real numbers, is a subspace.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K