Are two charges always in electrostatic equilibrium?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of electrostatic equilibrium between two equal charges, specifically analyzing the forces acting on them as described by Coulomb's Law. It is established that while the forces on each charge are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction (F and -F), this does not imply that the charges are in electrostatic equilibrium if they are free to move. The definition of electrostatic equilibrium is clarified, indicating that it occurs when excess charges in a conductor have optimally distanced themselves to minimize repulsive forces, resulting in no further motion of charge on the surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law
  • Concept of electrostatic forces
  • Understanding of charged conductors
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conditions for electrostatic equilibrium in conductors
  • Explore the implications of charge distribution on the surface of conductors
  • Learn about the behavior of charges in electric fields
  • Investigate the differences between static and dynamic equilibrium in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in the principles governing electric charges and their interactions.

kay
Messages
60
Reaction score
2
What I studied was that the force on one charge due to another equal charge in the system of two charges was, (say) F; whereas the force on the other charge due to the first charge was found out to be -F. Hence they add up to be zero. So can I say that the two equal charges are in electrostatic equilibrium or to generalise any two equal charges are in electrostatic equilibrium?
(using coulomb's law)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
F and -F are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction.

Does that mean an equilibrium has been obtained?
( ie do 2 free electrons separated by a distance d and having F and -F acting on them continue to be separated by distance d? )
 
256bits said:
F and -F are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction.

Does that mean an equilibrium has been obtained?
( ie do 2 free electrons separated by a distance d and having F and -F acting on them continue to be separated by distance d? )
I don't think so...
 
So the two charges would not be in static equilibrium if they are both free to move about.

What if the charges were in a conductor.
Could an electrostatic equilibrium be reached in a conductor? And where would the charges then be located?

You may want to re-visit the definition of electrostatic equilibrium, such as
Electrostatic equilibrium is the condition established by charged conductors in which the excess charge has optimally distanced itself so as to reduce the total amount of repulsive forces. Once a charged conductor has reached the state of electrostatic equilibrium, there is no further motion of charge about the surface.
from
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/estatics/u8l4d.cfm

( so, from you first post, the F and -F might not be enough to designate an electrostatic equilibrium situation for the charges )
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kay

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K