Are zero divisors in R[x] also zero divisors in R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuy52506
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Zero
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 3K views
chuy52506
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Let R be a commutative ring. If an doesn't equal 0 and
a0+a1x+a2x^2+...+anx^n is a zero divisor in R[x], prove that an is a zero divisor in R.


What I did was say if the polynomial is a zero divisor in R[x] then let that polynomial equal p(x) and any other polynomial be q(x) with coefficients b0,b1,...,bm, then p(x)*q(x)=0. And the leading coefficient and degree will be an*bm*x^(n+m) which will be a zero divisor in R. Therefore an will be a zero divisor. However I don't know what to say to show this? is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a mostly correct argument: you have the right basic idea, but a couple of points come across as nonsense or misstated. You say "let [tex]p[/tex] be a zero divisor and [tex]q[/tex] be any other polynomial, then [tex]pq = 0[/tex]". This is false. What it means for [tex]p[/tex] to be a zero divisor is that there exists a polynomial [tex]q[/tex] such that [tex]pq = 0[/tex]. Also, it doesn't make sense to say "[tex]a_n b_m x^{n+m}[/tex] is a zero divisor in [tex]R[/tex]", as this is a monomial that lives in [tex]R[x][/tex], not in [tex]R[/tex].

Other than that, your argument just needs text editing. Try correcting these points, and then one of us can show you how to clean up the wording.