Are zero divisors in R[x] also zero divisors in R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuy52506
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, participants analyze the relationship between zero divisors in the polynomial ring R[x] and the ring R. The main conclusion is that if a polynomial p(x) with leading coefficient an is a zero divisor in R[x], then its leading coefficient an must also be a zero divisor in R. The argument presented involves the multiplication of polynomials p(x) and q(x), but it is clarified that for p to be a zero divisor, there must exist a specific polynomial q such that their product equals zero, rather than any polynomial q. Misstatements regarding the nature of zero divisors and the context of monomials are also addressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings
  • Familiarity with polynomial rings, specifically R[x]
  • Knowledge of zero divisors in ring theory
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of polynomials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of zero divisors in commutative rings
  • Explore polynomial ring operations and their implications in ring theory
  • Learn about the structure of R[x] and its relationship with R
  • Investigate examples of zero divisors in specific rings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone studying ring theory or polynomial algebra will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the properties of zero divisors in commutative rings.

chuy52506
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Let R be a commutative ring. If an doesn't equal 0 and
a0+a1x+a2x^2+...+anx^n is a zero divisor in R[x], prove that an is a zero divisor in R.


What I did was say if the polynomial is a zero divisor in R[x] then let that polynomial equal p(x) and any other polynomial be q(x) with coefficients b0,b1,...,bm, then p(x)*q(x)=0. And the leading coefficient and degree will be an*bm*x^(n+m) which will be a zero divisor in R. Therefore an will be a zero divisor. However I don't know what to say to show this? is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a mostly correct argument: you have the right basic idea, but a couple of points come across as nonsense or misstated. You say "let p be a zero divisor and q be any other polynomial, then pq = 0". This is false. What it means for p to be a zero divisor is that there exists a polynomial q such that pq = 0. Also, it doesn't make sense to say "a_n b_m x^{n+m} is a zero divisor in R", as this is a monomial that lives in R[x], not in R.

Other than that, your argument just needs text editing. Try correcting these points, and then one of us can show you how to clean up the wording.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K