MHB Areas of Plane Figures: 63.0 & 96.0 | Need Help w/ 3 & 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Etrujillo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Areas Plane
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the areas of various plane figures, specifically a trapezoid and a parallelogram, with initial answers provided as 63.0 m² and 96.0 in², respectively. For the trapezoid, the area formula A=(h/2)(B+b) is applied, yielding an approximate area of 60 m². The area of a kite is also discussed, with calculations suggesting an area of about 90 cm² using the product of its diagonals. The participants express confusion regarding finding the height of the trapezoid using Pythagorean theorem, with guidance provided on how to approach the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of rounding to the nearest tenth for final answers.
Etrujillo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I think the answer to number 1 is 63.0 or 60 if rounded to the nearest tenth, and i think number 2 is. 96.0 or 100 if rounded to the nearest tenth. Need help with 3 and 4. I think for 3 i would add 6 and 8 as the vertical diagonal and the horizontal diagonal would be 5 . 6+8=14 so the area would =35(rounded to nearest tenth would be 40) am i correct? Number 4 is where i get completely lost.

View attachment 8703
 

Attachments

  • 20181204_093318-1-2.jpg
    20181204_093318-1-2.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 106
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.) The area for a trapezoid is given by:

$$A=\frac{h}{2}(B+b)$$

Plugging in the given values, we find:

$$A=\frac{6\text{ m}}{2}(11+10)\text{ m}=63\text{ m}^2\approx60\text{ m}^2\quad\checkmark$$

2.) The area for a parallelogram is given by:

$$A=bh$$

Plugging in the given values, we find:

$$A=(12\text{ in})(8\text{ in})=96\text{ in}^2\approx100\text{ in}^2\quad\checkmark$$

3.) The area for a kite can be found from the product of its diagonals. We can see one is 10 cm in length, and we can use Pythagoras to get the other:

$$\sqrt{6^2-5^2}+\sqrt{8^2-5^2}=\sqrt{6}+\sqrt{39}$$

And so the area is:

$$A=(10\text{ cm})((\sqrt{6}+\sqrt{39})\text{ cm})=10(\sqrt{6}+\sqrt{39})\text{ cm}^2\approx90\text{ cm}^2$$

4.) We have a trapezoid, and we know the big base \(B\) and the little base \(b\), but we don't know the height \(h\). But, we can find it using Pythagoras. Consider the right triangle making up the left part of the diagram. We are given the hypotenuse, and the smaller leg must be half the difference between the big base and the little base. Can you continue to find the height?
 
If i use a2 + b2 = c2
I get 8^+4^=80
80 would be the other leg?
Would this be considered a right triangle?
So one leg would =4 (10-16) and the other 80?
 
I just noticed you are instructed to round to the nearest tenth, not ten. :)

To find the height you need to use:

$$3^2+h^2=8^2\implies h=\sqrt{8^2-3^2}=\sqrt{55}$$

Now, just plug in the numbers into the formula I gave in 1.) (Smile)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top