Arranging Charged Objects to Exert Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter runningirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charged Forces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on arranging three charged objects (A, B, and C) with charges of 2.0 C, -3.0 C, and -4.0 C, respectively, to achieve specific force conditions. The first requirement is to position A and B such that the force they exert on each other equals 0.00675 N. The second condition necessitates placing C so that the net force on it is zero. Participants emphasize the importance of calculating the distance between A and B using Coulomb's law and ensuring C is positioned outside the line segment between A and B to satisfy the force balance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law
  • Electric Field Concepts
  • Superposition Principle in Electrostatics
  • Basic Algebra for Solving Equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the distance between charges A and B using the equation F = k(qA*qB)/r².
  • Explore the concept of electric fields and how they interact with multiple charges.
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electrostatics for analyzing forces on charge C.
  • Investigate the implications of charge placement on net forces in electrostatic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone interested in solving problems related to electric forces and charge arrangements.

runningirl
Messages
118
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1.) You have three charged objects: A; B; and C. Given that qA = 2.0 C; qB = - 3.0 C; and qC = -4.0 C, how could you arrange A, B, and C so that:
a. The force that A exerts on B is equal to .00675 N.
b. The net force exerted on C is 0.0 N.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



..i have no idea where to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\vec{F} = q \vec{E}, \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}

You need to find a distance of A from B where they exert 0.00675 N on each other, which will be on a 1 dimensional axis, then add C somewhere along this line so that is equally attracted/repulsed and it cannot be between A and B since one of the objects repels it and the other attracts it.
 
Hi Runningirl.

consider point A at origin. and B on x axis, with abscissa x. then solve the force equation. Now place C at X2 distance from A and (x + X2) from B, and solve to find X2. (keeping the above reason by Bhumble in mind).
 
can i do .00675=9*10^9(2.0 )(3.0 )/d^2... find d for distance between a and b.
but how do i find the C distance?
 
Bhumble said:
\vec{F} = q \vec{E}, \vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}

You need to find a distance of A from B where they exert 0.00675 N on each other, which will be on a 1 dimensional axis, then add C somewhere along this line so that is equally attracted/repulsed and it cannot be between A and B since one of the objects repels it and the other attracts it.

Sorry, but I don't understand where I could put C.
 
consider C at X2. C cannot be between A and B. So once consider C on other side of A, next on the other side of B.
 
does it matter how far away it is from a or b? because i said it didn't.
 
of course it matters. it is affected by the electric fields of both A and B.
 
right..
i understand that c has to be an X2 distance, but how do i find that x2 distance?
 
  • #10
Two things to note is that superposition is applicable to the electric field and that the force on A from B is equal to the force on B from A.

For part (a) what you need to do is solve for r, which is the distance between the two point charges. \vec{F} = .00675 N = \frac{q_A q_B}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}

For part (b) it is essentially the same thing but you need to consider the distance of C from both A and B as well as determining the total force due to both of their individual forces. So
\vec{F} = 0 N = \frac{q_A q_C}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2} + \frac{q_B q_C}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}
I didn't specify very well in the above formula but r is a different value in the two summations so when you solve the problem use better nomenclature than I did.
 
  • #11
So, have you found the distance that's needed between qA and qB?

Next, think about this:
The magnitude of the force that qA exerts on qC has to be equal to the magnitude of the force that qB exerts on qC. (The forces just need to be in opposite directions.)

So, should qC be closer to qA or to qB?​
 
  • #12
shouldn't qc be closer to qa?
when i found the distance i said that d^2=some neg number so i think i did something wrong.
but i believe i had the right method.

.00675=9*10^9(2)(-3)/d^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K