How can I arrange peptides with S-S bonds in order?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TytoAlba95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the arrangement of peptides with S-S bonds, specifically addressing the reduction and alkylation of cysteine residues after HPLC separation. Participants clarify that while COFRADIC typically involves these modifications before HPLC, the context here requires understanding that the HPLC is performed prior to cleaving and protecting disulfide bridges. The correct answer to the peptide sequence problem is identified as (c), based on the understanding of intra-chain S-S bonding patterns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of peptide chemistry and cysteine residues
  • Knowledge of HPLC (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography) techniques
  • Familiarity with reduction and alkylation processes in protein chemistry
  • Awareness of disulfide bond formation and cleavage
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of reduction and alkylation in peptide synthesis
  • Study the COFRADIC method and its applications in peptide analysis
  • Explore HPLC techniques for separating peptide fragments
  • Investigate the mechanisms of disulfide bond formation and stability in proteins
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in peptide chemistry, biochemists studying protein structure, and anyone involved in the analysis of cysteine-linked peptides will benefit from this discussion.

TytoAlba95
Messages
132
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
A 30 residue peptide was treated with trypsin and the tryptic peptides we're separated by HPLC. Four peakes were obtained. Peptides corresponding to A, B, C and D we're reduced and alkylated selectively at Cys residues.
The sequences obtained are :
Relevant Equations
Please refer to the image below:
243429


I can't solve this at all. Please suggest some clues.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand the importance of the reduction/alkylation at cysteine residues? Note that this step happened after the HPLC separation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
TeethWhitener said:
Do you understand the importance of the reduction/alkylation at cysteine residues? Note that this step happened after the HPLC separation.

Thanks for pointing that out. I have read COFRADIC and in normal COFRADIC these modifications occur before the HPLC, isn't it?
The aim of reduction is to remove inter/ intra-chain disulphide bonds (here intra-chain) and the purpose of alkylation is to block the reactive -SH groups to prevent further s-s bonding.
 
SanjuktaGhosh said:
Thanks for pointing that out. I have read COFRADIC and in normal COFRADIC these modifications occur before the HPLC, isn't it?
The aim of reduction is to remove inter/ intra-chain disulphide bonds (here intra-chain) and the purpose of alkylation is to block the reactive -SH groups to prevent further s-s bonding.
COFRADIC isn’t relevant to this problem (unless the question says otherwise), but yes, there are protocols where the S-S bonds are reduced and protected first.

Focusing on the problem, you know that the HPLC is performed before the disulfide bridges are cleaved and protected, so given that info, which of the four sequences (with disulfide linkages) from your original problem are possible?
 
TeethWhitener said:
Focusing on the problem, you know that the HPLC is performed before the disulfide bridges are cleaved and protected, so given that info, which of the four sequences (with disulfide linkages) from your original problem are possible?

I can only guess, (d)? I did some research but couldn't find any info on intra-chain S-S bonding pattern.

However the answer provided is (c).
 
SanjuktaGhosh said:
I can only guess, (d)? I did some research but couldn't find any info on intra-chain S-S bonding pattern.

However the answer provided is (c).
Don’t guess. It might help to break the listed sequences into the fragments from HPLC and see where the cysteine linkages are.
 
I'm sorry, I can't come to any conclusion. I'm stuck. :oldconfused: To me (b) looks too complicated to exist, and the rest three seem feasible.
 
Did you try what I said? You need to put in some effort before I can give you more help.
 
TeethWhitener said:
Did you try what I said? You need to put in some effort before I can give you more help.
I couldn't understand initially but on a second attempt I understood! The peptide fragments that were linked by S-S bond were eluted together. The answer is c.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TeethWhitener

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K