MHB [ASK] polynomial f(x) divided by (x - 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
The polynomial f(x) = 2x^3 - 5x^2 + ax + 18 is divisible by (x - 3), leading to the conclusion that a must equal -9. When substituting a into f(x), the polynomial becomes 2x^3 - 5x^2 - 9x + 18. Dividing this by (x - 1) results in a quotient of 2x^2 - 3x - 12 with a remainder of 6, indicating that f(x) is not divisible by (x - 1). The discussion highlights a potential error in the original question, as the expected results do not align with the calculations performed.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
A polynomial f(x) = [math]2x^3-5x^2+ax+18[/math] is divisible by (x - 3). The result of that polynomial f(x) divided by (x - 1) is ...
A. [math]2x^2-7x+2[/math]
B. [math]2x^2+7x-2[/math]
C. [math]2x^2-7x-2[/math]
D. [math]x^2-6x-2[/math]
E. [math]x^2-6x+3[/math]

I got a + 3 = -6 and so a = -9 and f(x) = [math]2x^3-5x^2-9x+18[/math], but when I divided it with x - 1 I got [math]x^2-3x+6[/math] with the remainder 24. I'm quite sure that the question isn't wrong since it's in a national level exam, but where did I go wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
A polynomial f(x) = [math]2x^3-5x^2+ax+18[/math] is divisible by (x - 3).

If a polynomial is divisible by $(x-k)$, then $f(k) = 0$

$f(3) = 0 \implies a = -9 \implies f(1) = 6$

$f(1) \ne 0 \implies f(x)$ is not divisible by $(x-1)$.

My opinion is there is an error in the question somewhere.
 
Synthetic Division does some useful things.

Code:
3 |  2  -5    a       18
         6    3     3a + 9
-------------------------
     2   1  a+3      3a+27 = 0 ==> a = -9

1 |  2  -5    -9      18
         2    -3     -12
-------------------------
     2  -3   -12      6

And thus we see: $2x^{2} - 3x - 12 + \dfrac{6}{x-1}$

How did you get only x^2, instead of 2x^2? Something wrong there.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top