MHB [ASK] polynomial f(x) divided by (x - 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
A polynomial f(x) = [math]2x^3-5x^2+ax+18[/math] is divisible by (x - 3). The result of that polynomial f(x) divided by (x - 1) is ...
A. [math]2x^2-7x+2[/math]
B. [math]2x^2+7x-2[/math]
C. [math]2x^2-7x-2[/math]
D. [math]x^2-6x-2[/math]
E. [math]x^2-6x+3[/math]

I got a + 3 = -6 and so a = -9 and f(x) = [math]2x^3-5x^2-9x+18[/math], but when I divided it with x - 1 I got [math]x^2-3x+6[/math] with the remainder 24. I'm quite sure that the question isn't wrong since it's in a national level exam, but where did I go wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
A polynomial f(x) = [math]2x^3-5x^2+ax+18[/math] is divisible by (x - 3).

If a polynomial is divisible by $(x-k)$, then $f(k) = 0$

$f(3) = 0 \implies a = -9 \implies f(1) = 6$

$f(1) \ne 0 \implies f(x)$ is not divisible by $(x-1)$.

My opinion is there is an error in the question somewhere.
 
Synthetic Division does some useful things.

Code:
3 |  2  -5    a       18
         6    3     3a + 9
-------------------------
     2   1  a+3      3a+27 = 0 ==> a = -9

1 |  2  -5    -9      18
         2    -3     -12
-------------------------
     2  -3   -12      6

And thus we see: $2x^{2} - 3x - 12 + \dfrac{6}{x-1}$

How did you get only x^2, instead of 2x^2? Something wrong there.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top