MHB [ASK]Show that the sum of the fifth powers of these numbers is divisible by 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the sum of the fifth powers of ten integers, which sum to zero, is divisible by 5. Fermat's Little Theorem is applied, stating that for any integer a, a^5 is congruent to a modulo 5. This implies that the sum of the fifth powers of the integers is congruent to the sum of the integers themselves modulo 5. Since the sum of the integers is zero, it follows that the sum of their fifth powers is also zero modulo 5, confirming divisibility by 5. The key takeaway is that the condition of the integers summing to zero is crucial for the proof.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
The sum of ten integers is 0. Show that the sum of the fifth powers of these numbers is divisible by 5.

For this one I don't know what I have to do at all other than brute-forcing which may even be impossible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
The sum of ten integers is 0. Show that the sum of the fifth powers of these numbers is divisible by 5.

For this one I don't know what I have to do at all other than brute-forcing which may even be impossible.

Hi Monoxdifly,

The number of integers does not matter. This would be a great time to use Fermat's Little Theorem : for any integer $a$, $a^5\equiv a\pmod5$, since $5$ is prime.
 
castor28 said:
Hi Monoxdifly,

The number of integers does not matter. This would be a great time to use Fermat's Little Theorem : for any integer $a$, $a^5\equiv a\pmod5$, since $5$ is prime.

So you mean that it applies to any number? That "The sum of ten integers is 0" is just a distraction, then?
 
Monoxdifly said:
So you mean that it applies to any number? That "The sum of ten integers is 0" is just a distraction, then?
Hi Monoxdifly,

The distraction is the fact that there are ten integers. The fact that the sum is $0$ is essential.

More precisely, if the integers are $a, b, c, \ldots$, Fermat's theorem tells us that $a^5\equiv a, b^5\equiv b\ldots\pmod5$.

We have therefore $a^5 + b^5 + \cdots\equiv a + b + \cdots\pmod 5$. As we are told that $a + b +\cdots=0\equiv0\pmod5$, we conclude that $a^5 + b^5 + \cdots\equiv0\pmod5$, which means that the sum is divisible by $5$.
 
I think I kinda get a grasp here. Thanks for your help.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top