MHB [ASK]Solution Set of a Trigonometry Inequation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the trigonometric inequality $$2\sin^2x \geq 3\cos2x + 3$$ within the interval [0, 2π]. The correct approach leads to the critical values $$x = \frac{\pi}{3}, \frac{2\pi}{3}, \frac{4\pi}{3}, \frac{5\pi}{3}$$, resulting in the intervals $$[\frac{\pi}{3}, \frac{2\pi}{3}] \cup [\frac{4\pi}{3}, \frac{5\pi}{3}]$$. The error in the initial solution was neglecting the negative solutions when taking the square root, which led to missing intervals. The final correct intervals are $$[60°, 120°] \cup [240°, 300°]$$, indicating that the sum of the endpoints a + b + c + d is not among the original options. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both positive and negative solutions in trigonometric equations.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
The set of real numbers x at the interval [0, 2π ] which satisfy $$2sin^2x\geq3cos2x+3$$ takes the form [a, b] ∪ [c, d]. The result of a + b + c + d is ...
a. 4π
b. 5π
c. 6π
d. 7π
e. 8π

What I've done thus far:
$$2sin^2x\geq3cos2x+3$$
$$2sin^2x\geq3(cos2x+1)$$
$$2sin^2x\geq3(cos^2x-sin^2x+sin^2x+cos^2x)$$
$$2sin^2x\geq3(2cos^2x)$$
$$sin^2x\geq3cos^2x$$
$$\frac{sin^2x}{cos^2x}\geq3$$
$$tan^2x\geq3$$
$$tanx\geq\sqrt3$$
$$tanx\geq tan60°$$ or $$tanx\geq tan240°$$
Since the value of tangent become negative after 90° and 270° respectively, I assume that [a, b] ∪ [c, d] is [60°, 90°] ∪ [240°, 270°] thus a + b + c + d = 660° = $$3\frac23\pi$$, but it isn't in the options. Where did I do wrong? I'm sure I solved the inequation alright and just blundered in determining the intervals, but how should I fix them?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dividing by $\cos^2{x}$ was a mistake because $\dfrac{\pi}{2}$ and $\dfrac{3\pi}{2}$ are in the solution set$2\sin^2{x} \ge 3[\cos(2x)+1]$

$2\sin^2{x} \ge 3(1-2\sin^2{x} +1)$

$8\sin^2{x} \ge 6$

$\sin^2{x} - \dfrac{3}{4} \ge 0$

$\left(\sin{x}-\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right) \left(\sin{x} + \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right) \ge 0$

critical values are $x = \dfrac{\pi}{3}, \dfrac{2\pi}{3}, \dfrac{4\pi}{3}, \dfrac{5\pi}{3} $

inequality is true for $x$ in the intervals $\left[\dfrac{\pi}{3}, \dfrac{2\pi}{3} \right] \cup \left[\dfrac{4\pi}{3}, \dfrac{5\pi}{3} \right]$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Damn, I should've kept an eye on the denominator. Thanks for your guidance.
 
Monoxdifly said:
$$tan^2x\geq3$$
$$tanx\geq\sqrt3$$
$$tanx\geq tan60°$$ or $$tanx\geq tan240°$$
Since the value of tangent become negative after 90° and 270° respectively, I assume that [a, b] ∪ [c, d] is [60°, 90°] ∪ [240°, 270°] thus a + b + c + d = 660° = $$3\frac23\pi$$, but it isn't in the options. Where did I do wrong? I'm sure I solved the inequation alright and just blundered in determining the intervals, but how should I fix them?

Also consider that when you take a square root, there is usually a positive and a negative solution.
It should be:
$$\tan^2x\ge 3 \\
|\tan x|\ge \sqrt 3 \\
\tan x \ge \sqrt 3 \quad\lor\quad \tan x \le -\sqrt 3 \\
60° \le x < 90° \quad\lor\quad 90°<x\le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x < 270° \quad\lor\quad 270°<x\le 300°
$$
Since we accidentally lost the solutions where $\cos x=0$, we can deduce that it is actually:
$$60° \le x \le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x \le 300° $$
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Also consider that when you take a square root, there is usually a positive and a negative solution.
It should be:
$$\tan^2x\ge 3 \\
|\tan x|\ge \sqrt 3 \\
\tan x \ge \sqrt 3 \quad\lor\quad \tan x \le -\sqrt 3 \\
60° \le x < 90° \quad\lor\quad 90°<x\le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x < 270° \quad\lor\quad 270°<x\le 300°
$$
Since we accidentally lost the solutions where $\cos x=0$, we can deduce that it is actually:
$$60° \le x \le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x \le 300° $$
That means I'm not completely wrong, am I?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top