Asking about Chatgpt and Proprietary Software

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of using ChatGPT for reviewing code, particularly in the context of proprietary software and privacy concerns. Participants explore the potential risks associated with sharing code with AI models and the legal ramifications of such interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that ChatGPT seems to assume shared ownership of the code, questioning whether this implies that the AI or its company could copy the code shared by users.
  • Another participant suggests that the terms of use may clarify whether conversations are recorded and used to improve the model, raising questions about transparency in these practices.
  • A different viewpoint highlights the risk of AI potentially reproducing flawed code shared by users, which could lead to problems for those who may not be experts in programming.
  • One participant mentions alternative AI tools, like GPT4All, that can be used locally to avoid privacy concerns associated with cloud-based models, suggesting that these alternatives may be more suitable for sensitive work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of using ChatGPT for code review. There are multiple competing views regarding the risks and legalities involved, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the terms of use and the potential for AI to replicate shared code, but there are no definitive conclusions drawn about these issues.

hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
Hello all:

i was reviewing matlab related book few days ago , and used Chatgpt to explain a code which was mentioned in the book , chatgpt explained it , but i felt that it assumed that i am sharing the code with it , not posting it for the program to read it and generate an explanation , which sounded wired , like the program is using a legal terms ? why ?
did any one noticed that or i am exaggerating ?

will that means if a scientist is working on a code in some lab , and he posted part of his work to chatgpt for review will mean that chatgpt or its company can copy it ?
should the scientific community be notified about this ?

Best Regards
H
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexB23
Computer science news on Phys.org
hagopbul said:
will that means if a scientist is working on a code in some lab , and he posted part of his work to chatgpt for review will mean that chatgpt or its company can copy it ?
should the scientific community be notified about this ?
What do the terms of use say? I'm sure they make it clear if they are recording and using the conversations to hone the model(and why wouldn't they do that?).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexB23
i didnt read the terms of use yet ,
why didnt they do that ?
maybe some one posted a code with some mistakes , the program repost that code for other one who is not expert in the field of computer programming , after copying and pasting the code as it is , it may create problems

maybe the scientist dont know that the program are copying the code , for example another compnay use the program and ask about a code and that scientist code be printed on the screen
 
hagopbul said:
Hello all:

i was reviewing matlab related book few days ago , and used Chatgpt to explain a code which was mentioned in the book , chatgpt explained it , but i felt that it assumed that i am sharing the code with it , not posting it for the program to read it and generate an explanation , which sounded wired , like the program is using a legal terms ? why ?
did any one noticed that or i am exaggerating ?

will that means if a scientist is working on a code in some lab , and he posted part of his work to chatgpt for review will mean that chatgpt or its company can copy it ?
should the scientific community be notified about this ?

Best Regards
H
If you ever feel nervous about using ChatGPT because of privacy concerns, there are free alternatives that he could use to review the stuff on his own laptop or desktop. For myself, I use GPT4All by Nomic, which is free and open source. I use this app on my computer to talk about deep stuff, such as science, religion and TV shows. It can learn PDFs and spreadsheets (supposedly, but I have not tried the latter), and is a front-end for both open-source and closed-source AI models such as Llama 11B, Mistral 7B or any other AI model of your choosing.

Just make sure your computer has decent RAM. The app can recommend AI models that are suitable for the amount of RAM on your machine. My computer has 8 GB of RAM, so it recommended me smaller models (under 7 billion parameters).

Source:
https://www.nomic.ai/gpt4all

The stuff in red are questions that other people have asked me, or sensitive political topics, because as a centrist moderate, I have asked the AI to compare 1970s platforms with modern day platforms. The machine managed to recommend some good UK period pieces, and cited its sources, all while running locally on my CPU.

1728839496328.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
959