Associativity of operators in quantum mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the time derivative of an operator in quantum mechanics, specifically < \frac{\partial {A}}{\partial t} >. Participants explore two interpretations: one involving the derivative of the operator acting on the wave function, and the other treating the operator's time dependence. The concept of operator associativity is examined, revealing that while operators can be associative, the derivative operator \frac{\partial}{\partial t} behaves differently when applied to products involving time-dependent operators. The correct expectation value is established as <\phi, \frac{dA(t)}{dt}\phi>.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics operators and their properties
  • Familiarity with expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Concept of time-dependent operators in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of time-dependent operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the mathematical framework of operator theory in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of operator associativity in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the derivation of expectation values for time-dependent states
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in quantum theory, and researchers interested in operator dynamics and their implications in quantum systems.

p6.626x1034js
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the correct interpretation of
[tex]< \frac{\partial {A}}{\partial t} >[/tex], where A is an operator?

Homework Equations


for a wave function [tex]\phi[/tex] and operator A,
[tex]<A> = \int_{V}\phi^{*}(A\phi)dV[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought it could mean
[tex]< \frac{\partial {A}}{\partial t} > = \int_{V}\phi^{*}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(A\phi)dV[/tex]
but then again it might mean
[tex]< \frac{\partial {A}}{\partial t} > = \int_{V}\phi^{*}(\frac{\partial A}{\partial t})(\phi)dV[/tex].

I read an article saying that operators are associative. But, when I think about the operators [tex]t[/tex] and [tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial t}[/tex], then,

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(t\phi\right) = t\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial t} + \phi \neq \left(\frac{\partial t}{\partial t}\right)\phi = \phi[/tex]

any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The d/dt is not an operator in the normal sense. A(t) is interpreted as a set of operators which depend on a parameter, t. The derivative of this A(t) wrt the parameter is defined by means of a limiting procedure always in the presence of vectors in the domain of all A(t).

[tex]\frac{d A(t)}{dt} \psi = \lim_{t\rightarrow 0} \frac{A(t)\psi - A(0)\psi}{t}[/tex]

The expectation value is then simply [itex]\left\langle \phi, \frac{dA(t)}{dt}\phi\right\rangle[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K