Assume that f is a continuous, real-valued function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that for a continuous, real-valued function f defined on a metric space X, if a sequence {xn} converges to x, then Limn→∞f(xn) = f(x). Participants emphasize the importance of using the formal definition of continuity and limits, specifically the ε-δ criterion. Suggestions include ensuring clarity in the proof structure and explicitly stating the quantifiers involved. There is also a recommendation to adapt the proof for cases where the codomain is an arbitrary metric space. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for precision and completeness in mathematical proofs.
Ric-Veda
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Assume that f is a continuous, real-valued function defined on a metric space X. If {xn} is a sequence in X converging to x, prove that Limn→∞f(xn) = f(x).

Here is my attempt, but I am not sure if it is correct.

Advanced Calculus test question 4.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Advanced Calculus test question 4.jpg
    Advanced Calculus test question 4.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 1,068
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual way is to use the definitions. What you need to prove is that given any ε>0, there is an N such that (\forall n>N)(\vert f(x_{n})-f(x)\vert <\epsilon). You do this in steps:
  • First, since f is continuous, you can find a δ...
  • Then since \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}x_{n}=x, there is an N such that...
  • Therefore...
Fill in the rest of the arguments!
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
Ric-Veda said:
Assume that f is a continuous, real-valued function defined on a metric space X. If {xn} is a sequence in X converging to x, prove that Limn→∞f(xn) = f(x).

Here is my attempt, but I am not sure if it is correct.

View attachment 224230

Anu proof will have to use the definition. Where did you pick an epsilon greater than 0? It is weird to pick ##n##. I suggest you follow the proof strategy suggested by @Svein, and after you are done with the proof, convince yourself that the same proof also applies where the codomain is an arbitrary metric space (i.e. change the absolute values with a distance function and look careful that you never used something else)
 
Here is my new solution, but I'm not sure if the graph I put is of any use, but if you can, please put up a similar graph to the one I put to help better understand.
Advanced Calculus test question 5.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Advanced Calculus test question 5.jpg
    Advanced Calculus test question 5.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 937
Ricster55 said:
Here is my new solution, but I'm not sure if the graph I put is of any use, but if you can, please put up a similar graph to the one I put to help better understand.
View attachment 224259

Why ##\exists n_0: |f(x_n)-f(x)| < \epsilon \forall n \geq n_0##? That shouldn't be included in your proof at the beginning, unless you explicitely say that this is what you are going to prove. Also, your lack of the ##\forall x \in X## quantifier is not so good. You should include it. But for the rest, the argument seems fine.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K