Assumption true on specific heat capacity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between specific heat capacity and heat conduction. It establishes that a higher specific heat capacity does not necessarily indicate better heat conduction, as evidenced by water's higher heat capacity compared to copper, despite being a poorer conductor. The conversation highlights that heat capacity primarily relates to heat storage rather than conduction, and introduces the concept of heat diffusivity, which combines heat conductivity and heat capacity to describe heat propagation in materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal conductivity (W/K/m)
  • Knowledge of specific heat capacity (J/kg/K)
  • Familiarity with heat diffusivity concepts
  • Basic principles of heat transfer in solids and fluids
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the kinetic theory of ideal gases and its implications on heat conduction
  • Explore the concept of heat diffusivity and its applications in fire protection materials
  • Investigate the relationship between vibrational modes in atoms and heat capacity
  • Examine case studies comparing heat conduction in various materials with differing heat capacities
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, materials science, and engineering, particularly those focused on thermal properties and heat transfer mechanisms.

greenfloss
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Is my assumption here true?

Does having a higher specific heat capacity mean that the object will be a better conductor of heat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heat conduction reflects how uniform the temperature is within a body, which is controlled by thermal conductivity. Heat capacity is defined as the ratio of input heat to variation in temperature, and reflects a body's capacity for storing heat.
 
Not necessarily. Water has a higher heat capacity than copper but is a much worse conductor of heat.
 
So is it the other way around?
 
Mentz114 said:
Not necessarily. Water has a higher heat capacity than copper but is a much worse conductor of heat.

Fluids are more complicated, since they can also transport heat via convection (if they flow). Coming back to original question, heat capacity doesn't play a role in heat conduction, but rather in heat storage.
 
Greenfloss, look up some data on heat conduction and heat capacity.
For simple solids like metal there may be a relationship. Or even with gases.
The theory of heat capacity was important in establishing molecular structure because heat capacity depends on the number of vibrational modes between atoms.
 
I am not aware of a correlation between heat conductivity (W/K/m) and heat capacity (J/kg/K).
However, I would not exclude some correlation for some groups of materials.
For example, it would be good to go back to the kinetic theory of ideal gases to check for such a link.

In the absence of such a link, we have to be more precise about this question.
For example, we could consider heat conduction in materials with the same heat conductivity.
In that case, the heat capacity delays the propagation of heat waves.
It decreases the overall heat conduction.
This is why, in fire protection, materials with high heat capacity might offer some protection, they retard the propagation.
This effect is summarized in a parameter called heat diffusivity, which is essentially the ratio of heat conductivity and heat capacity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
844
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K