At what size do turbines stop becoming efficient?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kidphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Turbines
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency of turbines at different sizes, exploring why small turbines are less common and the factors that influence their efficiency. It includes considerations of technical specifications, manufacturing tolerances, and economic factors related to turbine production.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the lack of small turbines may relate more to output rather than efficiency.
  • One participant notes that blade tip clearance is a significant factor affecting turbine efficiency, particularly in smaller turbines.
  • Another participant questions the definition of "small," referencing dental turbines with a diameter of 10mm and discussing their manufacturing tolerances.
  • There is a mention of the economic principle of economies of scale, arguing that it is generally more cost-effective to produce larger turbines rather than many smaller ones for the same output.
  • A participant brings up the neon coolant pump on the Hubble Space Telescope as an example of a small turbine, questioning its operational speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on what constitutes a "small" turbine and the implications of size on efficiency and output. There is no consensus on the efficiency of small turbines versus larger ones, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal size for turbine efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding turbine design, including the impact of centrifugal forces and manufacturing tolerances, but these aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.

Kidphysics
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
You never see them on small scales. Why not use small turbines with magnets on them to start a current?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It probably has more to do with output than efficiency.
 
Can you elaborate on this?
 
One of the criteria that affects turbine efficiency is blade tip clearance; proportionately it is higher in a small turbine then in a big turbine limiting overall efficiency.
 
What do you call small? Dentists have turbines in D=10mm tools.

In such a size, objects are manufactured easily with <100µm tolerance. Bigger wheels need clearance because of centrifugal force that strains parts, made worse by creeping if hot.
 
You never see them because they are small and easy to hide, like the APUs on commercial jets.
 
Enthalpy said:
What do you call small? Dentists have turbines in D=10mm tools.

In such a size, objects are manufactured easily with <100µm tolerance. Bigger wheels need clearance because of centrifugal force that strains parts, made worse by creeping if hot.
Yes but I'll bet that a dentists drill has never been sold on the basis that it is more efficient then a competitors. Same with APUs efficiencey will be low down the list of desirable criteria when speccing one.
 
IIRC, the neon coolant pump on the Hubble space Telescope is a very small turbine. Is that the one that spins at 400,000 RPM ?
 
Kidphysics said:
You never see them on small scales. Why not use small turbines with magnets on them to start a current?

Look up "The Economy of Scales".

It means it cost's less to make a few big things than to make a lot of smaller things that do the same job.

It doesn't always work. It was a rule of thumb wisely applied during the industrial revolution. It works for turbines producing power.

It costs less to make and operate 10 turbines that produce 10 megawatts apiece than 100 turbines that produce 1 megawatt apiece.

In particular, the economy of scales rule, when translated to mean "bigger is better" is broken with integrated circuit scaling. Smaller tansistors mean less wasted power, higher speed and more transistors on a chip. Smaller profiles are better in integrated circuit fabrication.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K