Kidphysics
- 164
- 0
You never see them on small scales. Why not use small turbines with magnets on them to start a current?
The discussion revolves around the efficiency of turbines at different sizes, exploring why small turbines are less common and the factors that influence their efficiency. It includes considerations of technical specifications, manufacturing tolerances, and economic factors related to turbine production.
Participants express differing views on what constitutes a "small" turbine and the implications of size on efficiency and output. There is no consensus on the efficiency of small turbines versus larger ones, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal size for turbine efficiency.
Participants highlight various assumptions regarding turbine design, including the impact of centrifugal forces and manufacturing tolerances, but these aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.
Yes but I'll bet that a dentists drill has never been sold on the basis that it is more efficient then a competitors. Same with APUs efficiencey will be low down the list of desirable criteria when speccing one.Enthalpy said:What do you call small? Dentists have turbines in D=10mm tools.
In such a size, objects are manufactured easily with <100µm tolerance. Bigger wheels need clearance because of centrifugal force that strains parts, made worse by creeping if hot.
Kidphysics said:You never see them on small scales. Why not use small turbines with magnets on them to start a current?