Atomic collisions must be elastic?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of collisions between ground-state hydrogen atoms, specifically whether such collisions must be elastic. The original poster presents a scenario involving a hydrogen atom with 12 eV of kinetic energy colliding with another atom at rest, applying conservation principles to argue that an inelastic collision cannot occur.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use conservation of energy and momentum to argue that the collision must be elastic, questioning whether all collisions between like atoms are elastic regardless of initial kinetic energy. Some participants challenge this conclusion, suggesting that the math should be worked out to verify the claim.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants providing mathematical reasoning and exploring the conditions under which inelastic collisions could occur. There is recognition that inelastic collisions are possible if certain conditions regarding kinetic energy are met, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the minimum energy required to change the internal state of a hydrogen atom is significant, which influences the discussion on the feasibility of inelastic collisions in this context. There are also mentions of quantum effects that could play a role in energy fluctuations during collisions.

gmark
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ground-state hydrogen atom with 12 ev kinetic energy collides head-on with another ground-state hydrogen atom at rest. Using principles of conservation of energy and momentum, show that an inelastic collision cannot occur. Therefore the collision must be elastic.

Homework Equations



Sum of energy before equals sum of energy after
Vector sum of momentum before equals vector sum of momentum after

The Attempt at a Solution



If the collision is inelastic, then the total kinetic energy after the collision will be less than it was before. Conservation of energy requires that the atoms absorb some of the initial kinetic energy and change their internal state.

Conservation of momentum requires that the vector sum of velocities be unchanged by the collision (masses cancelling out). There is no way for this to occur, as I see it, if the total kinetic energy has been reduced by an inelastic collision. Therefore the collision must be elastic.

This logic seems to say that all collisions between like atoms are elastic. Correct? Regardless of the initial kinetic energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, gmark. Welcome to PF!
gmark said:
Conservation of momentum requires that the vector sum of velocities be unchanged by the collision (masses cancelling out). There is no way for this to occur, as I see it, if the total kinetic energy has been reduced by an inelastic collision. Therefore the collision must be elastic.

This logic seems to say that all collisions between like atoms are elastic. Correct? Regardless of the initial kinetic energy?

I don't think your conclusion is correct. Did you actually go through the math to show that in this problem the collision must be elastic?
 
TSny embarrasses me into working out the math. I find that my hand-waving was wrong. Inelastic collision is possible if at least half of the initial kinetic energy remains as kinetic energy after the collision. That is, up to half the initial K can change the atom's internal state if appropriate quantum levels are available.

Here's my math. Subscripts or superscripts indicate post-collision values, plain symbols are for pre-collision. Velocity is treated as scalar, since all motion is along a line.
v is velocity
m is atomic mass
K is kinetic energy

In a fully elastic collision, particles essentially exchange momenta. K = K'. At any time except during impact one particle or the other has zero velocity. In at least some inelastic collisions (eg bullet and ballistic pendulum), both particles have non-zero velocities after collision.

Conservation of momentum:
mv = m(v1 + v2)
so v = v1 + v2

Before collision:
K = 1/2(mv2) = 1/2(m(v1 + v2)2)

After:
K' = 1/2(m(v12 + v22))

This gives

v12 - v*v1 + (K - K')/m = 0

where v = √(2K/m)

Values of v1 are real for K' ≥ K/2, so inelastic collisions are possible provided less than half of the initial kinetic energy is "lost."
 
What is the answer to the original problem then? K = 12 eV.
 
The answer is that this collision must be elastic. The least amount of energy that a stationary ground-state H atom can absorb is 10.2ev, to change the principal quantum number n from 1 (-13.6ev) to 2 (-3.4ev). Such a change would result in a residual K' = 12.0 - 10.2 = 1.8ev, which is less than K/2. This particular inelastic collision could not occur.

The answer is also that inelastic atomic collisions are possible under certain conditions, contrary to my original conclusion that they cannot take place at all.
 
Very well.

Note, however, that there are smaller quantum effects, which are known as fine and hyperfine structures, where very tiny fluctuations of energy are possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K