Atomic diameter-scale measurements

  • Thread starter Thread starter DyerMaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Measurements
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of placing two objects with an atomic diameter-scale gap between them, requiring perfectly flat crystal surfaces. It highlights that due to quantum mechanics, atoms lack a defined size, complicating the concept of measuring distances at this scale. When surfaces approach atomic distances, they are considered to be in contact, challenging the idea of maintaining a gap. Additionally, while imaging techniques can capture these measurements, the interpretation of such images becomes complex at atomic scales. This underscores the difficulties in achieving precise measurements in atomic-scale interactions.
DyerMaker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Can be a length as short as diameter of atom measured out with today's technology?
To be more precise: can we put two objects together so there will be a space with width of one (or some number below 10) atom's diameter(s) between them?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For the question to make sense, you would need the surface of each object to be perfect, following a flat crystal plane. Then, because of quantum mechanics, an atom doesn't have a defined size. By the time the two surfaces would at about the atom-atom distance in the crystal, they would already be consider to be touching each other.
 
Well, kind of yes.
1700051306692.gif

Images can be made so measurements can be taken, but with this size it's already no longer simple what will an image show or what will a measurement measure.
 
Hi all, I've looked through design manuals (SDP/SI, Gates, Naismith) and textbooks like Shigley's, but haven't found an equation linking initial belt tension to pulley center-to-center distance for a timing belt. I understand initial tension is typically based on the applied load, but I'm curious: A) Is there a known equation relating tension to C-C distance? B) If not, how might one go about deriving it? Thanks in advance!

Similar threads