Atomic Nuclei: Liquid, Solid, Charged - Explained

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of atomic nuclei, specifically addressing concepts such as nuclear radius, the states of nuclei (liquid, solid, charged), and the distinction between experimental and theoretical data regarding these properties. Participants explore the implications of measuring nuclear size and the methodologies involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the definitions and measurements of nuclear radius, suggesting that the nucleus is a diffuse quantum object rather than a solid entity.
  • There is a distinction made between the "radius" of nuclear matter (neutrons and protons) and the "charged radius," which pertains to the distribution of protons.
  • One participant proposes a method for measuring nuclear matter distribution using a Fermi function and discusses the significance of the 0.9R measurement.
  • Another participant expresses a need for recent studies on nuclear radius, particularly for isotopes with mass number less than 10, indicating difficulty in finding comprehensive sources.
  • Concerns are raised about the availability of nuclear radius data for various isotopes, with one participant noting challenges in sourcing reliable information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of nuclear radius, with some emphasizing its theoretical aspects while others point to experimental measurements. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best sources for nuclear radius data and the definitions of the terms used.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations in the definitions of nuclear radius and the challenges in measuring it, noting that the concept is dependent on the chosen distribution function and the methodology used in experiments.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in nuclear physics, particularly those exploring the properties of atomic nuclei and the methodologies for measuring nuclear characteristics.

mist
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
how can you explain atomic nuclei. liquid, charged, solid what? and there are some words about nuclear radius rn, rp and rc. what is the meaning of these words. all these data are experimental results or calculated. one is "atomic data and nuclear data tables, vol 71, no. 1, 1999, G.A. Salazar, S.Raman, and P. Ring"

I believe all these data are theoretical not experimental results. is there any newest paper about nuclear radius. what is the meaning of "charged radius"

please reply

thanks

mist
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mist said:
how can you explain atomic nuclei. liquid, charged, solid what? and there are some words about nuclear radius rn, rp and rc. what is the meaning of these words. all these data are experimental results or calculated. one is "atomic data and nuclear data tables, vol 71, no. 1, 1999, G.A. Salazar, S.Raman, and P. Ring"

I believe all these data are theoretical not experimental results. is there any newest paper about nuclear radius. what is the meaning of "charged radius"

please reply

thanks

mist


In realliy, the nucleus is a diffuse quantum obejct, just as the atom itself. So the concept of "nuclear radius" is as diffuse concept as atomic radius. Neither the nucleus nor the atom are solid object, so we can't measure its size, as we could to with a tennis ball or macroscopic liquid drop.

What differs from the nucleus and the atom is that the nucleus consists of two kinds of particles: Electric Neutral Neutons and Electrical charged Protons. So what we can have is both the "radius" of the nuclear matter (particles that feels the strong force, i.e Neutrons and protons), we can have the "charged" radius, i.e the "radius" of the charge distribution (the protons..).

So why do we keep talking about radius when in reality the nucleus is a diffuse quantum obeject with a probability distribuion for the nucleons? And what do we mean by radius anyway? And how can we measure it?

First of all, we can measure the nuclear matter distribution as a function of radial distance (R) from center, and call 0.9R the radius. Where 0.9 means that at this distance, 90% of the nuclear matter is inside the distrubuion function. The distribution function used is often the "Fermi - function". [tex]p(r) = p_0 \dfrac{1}{1+\exp (r-R)/a}[/tex] Where R is the radius where p(R) = ½P_0, and a is the diffusness-contant, how sharp the "edge" is. (play with this forumula if you want for different R and a).

Second, we can use a distribution function and take the mean r - value of that, see my post #4 in this thread here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=212195

Or take the square root of the r^2 (also see post above).

How do we measure all this? ans: We do scattering, with electrons, alpha and pions. We probe the nuclues with these particles and we get a diffraction pattern. Then we use model, as the Fermi function for example, and put that into the scattering forumula and play with parameters etc. And depending on what probe you use, you get different patterns, and that means that distribution of protons and neutrons may differ etc.

All this is usally covered in introductory Nulcear Physics textbooks, I hope my answer at least helped you something :) It is not so technical as it sounds, very basic quantum mechanics I would say. So the concept of radius is both experimental and theoretical I would say. It is not really the radius, but it is often the sqrt of <^2> that is tabelled.
 
can you give me the most recent study about nuclear radius. I am not working at any university. some papers don't give radius if A<10, I need from proton to all.
 
"all" ? there are a lot of istopes between H and A=10 ;)

I have myself big problems to find a good source with Nuclear R.M.S radii for very many isotopes :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K