Attenuation and source positioning

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dade Murphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Attenuation Source
Click For Summary
Attenuation can be used to determine the distance to a source, but a single intensity measurement is insufficient for pinpointing the source's position due to the nature of the exponential decay relationship. To find the distance (x) or initial intensity (I0), multiple intensity measurements at various perpendicular distances can help establish geometric spreading. Using angular distribution data from multiple detectors can improve accuracy, although it may require several sensors for reliable results. Additionally, knowing the direction of radiation can enable the use of trigonometry for more precise calculations. Triangulation with sensors placed at different locations can further enhance the determination of the source's position.
Dade Murphy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I've been reading about attenuation, and I wonder if there's a way to determine the distance to your source. Forgive my poor writing; I'm new to the topic.

I understand that equation for linear attenuation is
I = I0e-μx
where:
I = intensity
I0 = initial intensity
μ = attenuation coefficient
x = distance traveled through medium​

My question is this: if I have the information μ and I, is there some way to determine x, and/or I0? It seems that I need to find either of those to find them both, so I wonder if there's some other measurements I could take that would make this possible.
For a simple-minded example, would it be possible to take measurements of intensity at a variety of perpendicular distances in order to determine the geometric spreading and work backward from that to find distance x?

Thank you kindly for your time and knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello Dade, :welcome:

If you draw a graph of the relationship, you can see that there is no way to pinpoint the source position from a single intensity measurement: the line can be extrapolated to the left and a source of the appropriate strength can be at any position.

Your recipe should work: you get some angular distribution and clearly the width depends on the distance from the source.

Alternatively, if you know the direction the radiation comes from (because of the way the detector is built, like with a peephole or something) you can use your measurement device to do a bit of trigonometry...
 
  • Like
Likes Dade Murphy
BvU, thank you for the quick response!

I'm glad that the angular distribution method would work, but I'm concerned that it may take quite a few detectors to be accurate. I'm thinking purely conceptually; I've never handled this sort of data before.
Also, I'm not sure that I understand your second suggestion. Do you mean something like a cluster of sensors receiving from very specific directions, and see which one gets the signal? I suppose I could do that in two places and triangulate, is that what you meant?
 
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K