Autist exposes the madness of non-autists

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PIT2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a video by Amanda Baggs, an autistic woman, showcasing her unique communication methods. The video is divided into two parts: the first illustrates her communication style, while the second translates it into conventional language for non-autistic viewers. Participants debate the nature of communication, questioning whether interactions with inanimate objects can be classified as communication and emphasizing the interconnectedness between individuals and their environments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of autism spectrum communication styles
  • Familiarity with non-verbal communication theories
  • Knowledge of environmental interaction concepts in psychology
  • Awareness of the social implications of language and communication
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of non-verbal communication in autism
  • Explore theories of environmental interaction in psychology
  • Study the role of language in social communication
  • Investigate the works of Amanda Baggs and similar advocates
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for psychologists, educators, autism advocates, and anyone interested in understanding diverse communication methods and the relationship between individuals and their environments.

PIT2
Messages
897
Reaction score
2
This is a video about and made by an autistic woman named Amanda Baggs.

- the first part shows how she communicates
- the second part translates it to our non-autistic language



I found the video on:

http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2007/01/autism_in_my_langua.html
http://joyofautism.blogspot.com/2007/01/she-speaks-for-herself.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Pretty interesting, however it is usually considered that one should have little reason to speak other than to communicate and communication assumes another party being communicated with. I don't think one can say that she was communicating with the water or the towel or whatever.

There is a sense that a language is not a language unless people use it to communicate. However I certainly can understand why she would interact with the environment; I do think it is fascinating to appreciate how we influence things around us at the same time as they influence us.

We aren't separate from the environment and can't be understood in a vacuum. The relationship between ourselves and the environment is as much a part of who we are as are our individual natures.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
562
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K