Automorphisms, Galois Groups & Splitting Fields

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the splitting field and Galois group for specific polynomials over the rational numbers, particularly focusing on the polynomial f(x) = x^4 - 2x^2 + 9 and later x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1. Participants explore the irreducibility of these polynomials, the structure of their splitting fields, and the nature of their Galois groups.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for help in finding the splitting field and Galois group for f(x) = x^4 - 2x^2 + 9, expressing uncertainty about their progress.
  • Another participant confirms the irreducibility of the polynomial over ℚ and discusses the implications for the degree of the splitting field.
  • It is noted that the splitting field E is Galois and has degree 4 over ℚ, leading to a Galois group of order 4.
  • Participants explore the structure of the splitting field and Galois group, with one concluding that the Galois group is the Klein 4-group.
  • In a later post, a participant introduces a new polynomial, x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1, and suggests that its splitting field can be found by recognizing it as the minimal polynomial of the fifth roots of unity.
  • Another participant corrects the terminology used regarding the minimal polynomial and discusses the irreducibility of the polynomial Φ5(x) and its implications for the Galois group.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the irreducibility of the first polynomial and the structure of its splitting field and Galois group. However, there is some contention regarding the terminology and understanding of the second polynomial's minimal polynomial and its implications, indicating a lack of consensus on certain points.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the properties of the polynomials and their roots are not explicitly stated, and there are unresolved questions about the nature of the Galois groups and their subfields.

mathjam0990
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let f(x)=x4-2x2+9
Find the splitting field and Galois group for f(x) over ℚ

Here is what I have written out so far. If I have found the splitting field E correctly, have I proceeded with the Gal(E/F) group correctly?

Also, how would I go about finding the roots of this equation by hand without a calculator?

If anyone could help me out with the answer and a detailed explanation to follow that would be very helpful. Thank you.

View attachment 5498
 

Attachments

  • ab alg.jpg
    ab alg.jpg
    67.4 KB · Views: 115
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, you've found the roots, that's good.

To know the degree of the splitting field over $\Bbb Q$, we need to know if $h(x)$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$.

We know that $h(x)$ has no linear factors in $\Bbb Q[x]$ (since none of the roots are rational), and thus also no rational cubic factors. Does it have any quadratic factors in $\Bbb Q[x]$?

If $h(x) = (x^2 + ax + b)(x^2 + cx + d)$ we have:

$a+c = 0$
$ac + b + d = -2$
$ad + bc = 0$
$bd = 9$.

So $c = -a$, and the third equation becomes $a(d - b) = 0$. Thus either $a = 0$, or $b = d$.

If $a = c = 0$, then the second equation is $b+d = -2$. Since $d = \dfrac{9}{b}$, we get:

$b + \dfrac{9}{b} = -2$, that is:

$b^2 - 2b + 9 = 0$. Checking the discriminant: $4 - 36 = -32 < 0$, we see this has no real, thus no rational, solutions.

Thus $b = \pm 3$. Substituting back in equation 2, either:

$-a^2 - 6 = -2 \implies a^2 = -4$ (for $b = -3$) , this is impossible;

$-a^2 + 6 = -2 \implies a^2 = 8$ (for $b = 3$), which has no rational solution, as $8$ is not a perfect square.

So we conclude that $h(x)$ is indeed irreducible, as its roots are all distinct it is separable, so the splitting field has degree $4 = \text{deg }h$ over $\Bbb Q$.

As this splitting field (let's call it $E$) is Galois (being a splitting field), we see that $|\text{Gal}(E/\Bbb Q)| = 4$.

So we are looking for a group of automorphisms of $E$, that fix $\Bbb Q$, of order $4$.

Now it should be clear that $E \subseteq \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i)$, since the roots of $h$ are contained in the latter field.

Furthermore, by factoring $h$ over the reals, we see that:

$h(x) = (x^2 + 2\sqrt{2}x + 3)(x^2 - 2\sqrt{2}x + 3)$.

Since $i \not\in \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$, and $i$ is a root of $x^2 + 1 \in \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})[x]$, we see that:

$[\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})] = 2$, and clearly $[\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}:\Bbb Q] = 2$, thus:

$[\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i):\Bbb Q] = [\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})][\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}:\Bbb Q] = 4$.

Since $[E:\Bbb Q] = 4$, as well, we see that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2},i)$ *is* $E$.

Complex-conjugation clearly gives us an element of $\text{Gal}(E/\Bbb Q)$ of order $2$ which fixes the subfield $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$.

The map: $\sqrt{2} \mapsto -\sqrt{2}, i \mapsto i$ also gives us an automorphism of order 2, so we conclude the Galois group is the Klein 4-group.

As far as "finding the roots by hand", since $h(x)$ is a bi-quadratic (a quadratic in $x^2$), it's really pretty easy:

Solve $y^2 - 2x + 9$ for $y$ by using the quadratic formula.

Sub $x^2$ in for $y$, and then solve the resulting two quadratics (you'll need to know how to take the square root of a complex number),

OR: solve the two (real) quadratics I found up above.
 
Very helpful information, thank you!...if I could ask one more question, say we have the polynomial x4+x3+x2+x+1 and we wanted to find a splitting field over ℚ. Could we approach this by recognizing that this is the minimum polynomial of Φ5(x) thus root ϑ = e2πi/5. So the minimum polynomial is (x-ϑ)(x-ϑ2)(x-ϑ3)(x-ϑ4) and because ϑ↦ϑk for k=1,2,3,4 then E = ℚ[e2πi/5] ? Thank you.
 
The phrase "minimum polynomial of $\Phi_5(x)$" makes no sense. It *is* the minimal polynomial of $e^{2\pi i/5}$, and the reason is that $\Phi_n(x)$ is irreducible for every $n \in \Bbb Z^+$. It's a non-trivial proof to show this for arbitrary $n$, but you can use a clever substitution to show it for $n = p$, a prime, so that you can apply the Eisenstein Criterion.

And yes, the splitting field is indeed $\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)$, where $\zeta_5 = e^{2\pi i/5}$ (the other roots are all powers of $\zeta_5$-in fact, the powers of $\zeta_5$ (including $1$) are a cyclic group of order 5, and the Galois group of $x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1$ is a cyclic group of order $4$, generated by the automorphism:

$\sigma:\zeta_5 \mapsto (\zeta_5)^2$

($\zeta_5 \mapsto (\zeta_5)^3$ also works).

Interestingly enough, since $\text{Gal}(\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)/\Bbb Q) \cong \Bbb Z_4$, it has a unique subgroup of order 2, and thus we have a unique subfield of $\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)$ of degree (dimension) 2 over the rationals.

Can you guess what this field might be? (Here is a helpful hint: $\sigma^2$ is complex-conjugation restricted to $\Bbb Q(\zeta_5)$, so how would you find real quadratic factors of $x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 1$?).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K