How Do Automorphisms Affect Elements in Non-Prime Subfields of Finite Fields?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of field automorphisms on elements within non-prime subfields of finite fields, specifically examining F_{2^{29}}, F_{2^{58}}, and F_{2^{116}}. It explores whether an element α in F_{2^{58}} \ F_{2^{29}} can become an element of F_{2^{29}} under the action of automorphisms. The response clarifies that since finite extensions of finite fields are Galois, automorphisms must map F_{2^{29}} to itself, implying that elements outside this subfield do not shift into it. Consequently, elements in F_{2^{58}} \ F_{2^{29}} remain in that space rather than transitioning to F_{2^{29}} or F_{2^{116}}. The discussion concludes that the nature of automorphisms ensures the preservation of the structure of these finite fields.
isaiah
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out the effect of a field automorphism on a field with a non prime subfield.

Say for example F_{2^{29}}, F_{2^{58}} and F_{2^{116}}

Let \alpha \in F_{2^{58}}\F_{2^{29}}

Under {\sigma}^{i}, 1 \le i \le 58 do we get any case where \alpha becomes an element of F_{2^{29}} ?

If not why not since the orbit of \alpha under this automorphism will be 58.

Does it mean that the other elements shift to F_{2^{116}}?

Thanks in advance.

Isaiah.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that a finite extension E/F is normal iff every automorphism of E sends F to itself. Since any finite extension of finite fields is Galois, any automorphism of F_2^58 must send F_2^29 to itself. Does that answer your question?
 
Now what really happens to the elements of F_2^58\F_2^29 (ie exclude the ones in F_2^29)? Do they go to F_2^29 or do they remain in F_2^58\F_2^29?

Thanks,

Isaiah.
 
Well, an automorphism is one to one and onto, so if f:A->A is one to one and onto, and f(B)=B, we must have f(A\B)=A\B, mustn't we?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K