Finite field is algebraically closed under constraint?

In summary: This law is due to R. M. Robinson and is quite similar to the classical law of quadratic reciprocity.In summary, a field K is called algebraically closed if any non-zero polynomial has at least one root in K. However, this does not hold true for finite fields. The question of which polynomials have roots in a finite field is difficult and can be approached through reciprocity laws. There is a version of quadratic reciprocity for polynomial rings over finite fields, but it is not as well-known as the classical law.
  • #1
gepolv
1
0
A field K is called algebraically closed field if any no-zero polynomial has at least one root in K.

Given finite field F_q, q=p^m, p is a prime and m is non-negative integer. A famous property of finite field is any element in F_q satisfies: x^q=x.

Then I have such an assumption:
F_q[x_1,x_2,...x_n] has at least one root with the constraint "degrees less than q".

I have two questions:
1: Is this assumption true?
2: If it is true, can I say "F_q" is algebraically closed under condition "degrees less than q"?

Thanks a lot.
Gepo
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Unfortunately, no. For example, the polynomial [tex] x^2 + 1 [/tex] has no root in [tex] \mathbb{F}_p [/tex] whenever [tex] p [/tex] is a prime congruent to 3 (mod 4). In fact, the question of which polynomials have roots in [tex] \mathbb{F}_p [/tex]--let alone [tex] \mathbb{F}_{p^k} [/tex]--is quite difficult in general. A typical approach to understanding degree-n equations in [tex] \mathbb{F}_p [/tex] is to look for so-called reciprocity laws that generalize the law of quadratic reciprocity, which allows for a complete understanding (in principle) of quadratic equations mod p. Laws of cubic, quartic, and quintic reciprocity are known, as well as some higher-degree versions as well. As far as I know, the most general reciprocity law currently known is the law of Artin reciprocity, which is a major theorem in class field theory.

Interestingly enough, there is a version of quadratic reciprocity for polynomial rings over finite fields (i.e., a law relating the "polynomial Legendre symbol" (f/g) to the symbol (g/f) for coprime polynomials f and g).
 

1. What is a finite field?

A finite field, also known as a Galois field, is a mathematical structure that consists of a finite set of elements and follows specific algebraic rules. It is often used in cryptography and coding theory.

2. What does it mean for a finite field to be algebraically closed?

A finite field is algebraically closed if every non-constant polynomial equation with coefficients in the field has a solution within the field. In other words, all roots of polynomials in the field are also in the field.

3. How is a finite field constrained?

A finite field is constrained by its characteristics, which is a prime number. This prime number determines the number of elements in the field and the operations that can be performed on them.

4. Why is it important for a finite field to be algebraically closed under constraint?

Having a finite field that is algebraically closed ensures that all polynomial equations within the field have solutions, making it easier to perform computations and solve problems. It also allows for the use of advanced mathematical concepts in fields such as cryptography.

5. Are all finite fields algebraically closed under constraint?

No, not all finite fields are algebraically closed. For a finite field to be algebraically closed, its characteristics must be a prime number, and not all finite fields have this property. However, there are methods for constructing an algebraically closed finite field by extending an existing finite field.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top