MHB -aux07.Venn diagram -about 120 students in a school

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating probabilities related to language studies among 120 students. It establishes that the probability of studying exactly two languages is 19/120, while the probability of studying only Japanese is 1/8. A key point is that the expression for the union of sets was misapplied, as it should involve set notation rather than numerical values. Additionally, the correct probability that a student does not study any language is 11/30, derived from subtracting the probability of studying a language from 1. Overall, the calculations for parts (a) and (b) are confirmed as correct, while part (c) requires clarification on notation and set operations.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
(a) since $n(U)=120$ and the intersections showing $8,7$ and $4$ added is $19$ then $\displaystyle\frac{19}{120}$ is the probability of studying exactly $2$ languages

(b) since $n(J)=35$ then subtracting $8,5,7$ would be $15$ so $\displaystyle\frac{15}{120}=\frac{1}{8}$ would be probability of studying only Japanese

(c) $\displaystyle\frac{n(C)\ \cup\ n(J)\cup \ n(S)}{n(U)}=
\frac{19}{30}$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(a) and (b) are correct. As for (c), you need to subtract your answer from 1 because the question asks for the probability that the student does not study any of these languages. The expression $n(C)\cup n(J)$ is a type error because $n(C)$ and $n(J)$ are numbers, while $\cup$ acts on sets. I agree that $n(C\cup J\cup S)=19\cdot4=76$, but it is strange that you did not explain this more difficult part while you explained the easier ones.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
(a) and (b) are correct. As for (c), you need to subtract your answer from 1 because the question asks for the probability that the student does not study any of these languages. The expression $n(C)\cup n(J)$ is a type error because $n(C)$ and $n(J)$ are numbers, while $\cup$ acts on sets. I agree that $n(C\cup J\cup S)=19\cdot4=76$, but it is strange that you did not explain this more difficult part while you explained the easier ones.

I probably misunderstood the notation. so $\frac{19}{30}$ is the probability that a student will study a language. and $\frac{11}{30}$ is the probability that a student does not study a language.

so saying $14\cup 16$ is improper it has to a $A\cup B$ etc
 
karush said:
I probably misunderstood the notation. so $\frac{19}{30}$ is the probability that a student will study a language. and $\frac{11}{30}$ is the probability that a student does not study a language.
Yes.

karush said:
so saying $14\cup 16$ is improper it has to a $A\cup B$ etc
Yes.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top