Average electronic momentum in bound state: please see this

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the average electronic momentum in an unperturbed electronic state of an atom or molecule, denoted as |a>. It is established that the average momentum

in any unperturbed eigenstate equals zero, as the momentum operator p is hermitian and the state |a> can be represented by a real-valued wave function. The conversation also addresses the implications of perturbing the system with a time-dependent scalar potential V(t) = V Cos(wt), asserting that the wave function remains real and

remains zero. However, there is contention regarding the assumption that the time-dependent wave function will be real, indicating a need for further clarification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Familiarity with hermitian operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of scalar potentials and their effects on quantum states
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about perturbation theory and its application to quantum systems
  • Explore the implications of time-dependent potentials on wave functions
  • Investigate the conditions under which wave functions remain real in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers exploring the behavior of electronic states under perturbations will benefit from this discussion.

ani4physics
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Someone please tell me if I am thinking right:

Let's consider an unperturbed electronic state of an atom/molecule. If we denote it by [a>, then the average electronic momentum in state [a> is,

<p> = <a]p[a> = (<a]p<a])* (because p is hermitian)
= (<a]*p*[a>*)
= (<a]p*[a>) (because [a> is real.)
= - (<a]p[a>) ( because p is purely imaginary. so p* = -p)
so, <p> = 0

so, the average momentum in any unperturbed eigenstate = 0

Now, the atom/molecule is being perturbed by a time-dependent scalar potential of the form V(t) = V Cos(wt). So we can write the time-dependent wave function as a perturbation series. Since there is no magnetic field, the wave function will be real and <p> = 0.

Is it true? Please correct me if I am doing it wrong. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ani4physics said:
<p> = <a]p[a> = (<a]p<a])* (because p is hermitian)
not quite
(<a|p <a|)* is nonsensical.
you could do <a| (p |a>) = <a| (<a| p^dagger)^dagger = <a| (<a| p)^dagger
or (<a|p ) |a> = (p^dagger |a>)^dagger |a> = (p |a>)^dagger |a>.

ani4physics said:
= (<a]*p*[a>*)
= (<a]p*[a>) (because [a> is real.)
what do you mean |a> is real? |a> is a STATE, not a number.

----
here's what i think you mean.

notice p is a hermitian operator so that for any state |a> we have
(<a|p|a>)* = <a|p|a>^dagger = <a| p^dagger |a> = <a|p|a>.

suppose |a> is a state such that <x|a> = a(x) is a real valued function.
[i.e. the wave-function is real (in the x - representation)]

then <a|p|a>= -i \hbar \int d^3x ( a^*(x) \nabla a(x) ) = -i \hbar \int d^3x ( a(x) \nabla a(x) )
first equality is definition, and second is assumption that a(x) is real valued.

since the integral of a real valued function (a a') is real, we have
(<a|p|a>)* = - (<a|p|a>).

so that <a|p|a> = 0.
-------

ani4physics said:
Now, the atom/molecule is being perturbed by a time-dependent scalar potential of the form V(t) = V Cos(wt). So we can write the time-dependent wave function as a perturbation series. Since there is no magnetic field, the wave function will be real and <p> = 0.

this doesn't follow. What makes you think the time-dependent wave function
will be real? what does the perturbation series have to do with anything?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K