Average IQ of Physicists: Is it Higher?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neyzenilhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iq Physicists
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the average IQ of physicists and whether it is significantly higher than that of the general population. Participants explore the implications of IQ testing, the definitions of intelligence, and the relevance of IQ scores in academic contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the definition of a 'physicist' and how it relates to the average IQ discussion.
  • There are claims that IQ tests may not accurately measure intelligence, with some arguing that the tests are biased towards academics.
  • One participant suggests that the average IQ of college graduates is 120, implying that physicists would have a higher average IQ than 100.
  • Another participant emphasizes a distinction between theoretical IQ distributions and the practical results of IQ tests, suggesting that the latter may not be a reliable measure of intelligence.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the relevance of IQ scores, comparing them to horsepower ratings in engines, questioning their ability to reflect true capability.
  • There are references to external sources discussing IQ in different fields, indicating a broader context for the discussion.
  • One participant mentions the influence of academic backgrounds on IQ test performance, suggesting that this could skew results.
  • Another participant advocates for a more informed discussion on IQ, referencing specific studies that challenge mainstream views on intelligence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relationship between IQ and intelligence, with no consensus on whether physicists have a higher average IQ than the general population. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity and implications of IQ testing.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of intelligence, potential biases in IQ testing, and the influence of academic backgrounds on test outcomes. There is also a lack of agreement on the relevance of IQ scores in measuring true intellectual capability.

neyzenilhan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
what is the average IQ of physicists?
is it much higher than the average IQ of general population?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What'd you call a 'physicist', is the issue that comes to mind I guess.

But yeah, obviously. Not in the least because of how IQ tests work.
 
is this related to your 'I want to love' thread in any way?

did you find a physicist?
 
neyzenilhan said:
what is the average IQ of physicists?
is it much higher than the average IQ of general population?

It's infinity+3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stehfahknee
Stratosphere said:
What does IQ have to do with intelligence?

What does the HP rating of an engine have to do with its power?
 
Well I've read that the average IQ of a college graduate is 120, so it only follows that the AVG IQ of physicists is much higher than 100.
 
  • #10
hamster143 said:
What does the HP rating of an engine have to do with its power?

It's not the same thing with an IQ. IQ measures mental deficiency not the other way around.
 
  • #11
I personally like to draw a firm line between 'IQ' as the theoretical normal distribution of intelligence and 'the result of an IQ test', as in, the assessment of such a test what one's IQ is. The former has very little theoretical basis, the latter is simply absurd to assume a test can measure a thing with such little basis to begin with.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stehfahknee
  • #12
My IQ was an A+
 
  • #13
neyzenilhan said:
what is the average IQ of physicists?
is it much higher than the average IQ of general population?
Since IQ tests are made by academics it is only natural that academics will do better on it, so yes.
 
  • #14
Klockan3 said:
Since IQ tests are made by academics it is only natural that academics will do better on it, so yes.

Unless the academic people realize this, and try to account for it, which they do in most of these test.
 
  • #15
Sometimes I get a feeling that anyone who wants to participate in a discussion that mentions "IQ" should be required to read at least one good non-PC study of the subject. Such as "The G factor" by Jensen, a work of the same name by Brand, or "The Bell Curve" by Herrnstein/Murray.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
34K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
32K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
783