Average value of sin(i) in radial velocities (exoplanets)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 3K views
cahill8
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
When a stars radial velocity is measured in search for a planet, the planet imparts a radial velocity shift proportional to [itex]m\sin i\text{ where }i[/itex] is the orbital inclination of the planet with respect to our line of sight and [itex]m[/itex] is the planet mass. I've heard that even though the inclinations are generally unknown, the true masses can be approximated for a large sample by multiplying [itex]m\sin i[/itex] values by 1.33. I'm wondering where this value comes from?

Assuming a uniform distribution of [itex]i[/itex], [itex]\int^\pi_0 \sin i di/\pi[/itex] gives a value of [itex]2/\pi[/itex] implying that the [itex]m\sin i[/itex] should be multiplied by [itex]\pi/2[/itex] (1.57, opposed to the 1.33 I've seen). Does anyone have a derivation or reference for this number?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't have a derivation for this number, but it seems like your phrase, "Assuming a uniform distribution of i" is where the discrepancy might come about. It could very well be that the i values are weighted in some way, to take into account that some inclination angles are observationally more likely than others.

I mean, for one thing, if i = 0 (or is it pi -- whichever one corresponds to the system being face-on), then there IS no radial component to the planet's velocity.