Avg. Acceleration of ball against a wall with two velocities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the average acceleration of a tennis ball rebounding off a wall. The initial velocity (Vi) is +9.6 m/s, and the final velocity (Vf) is -5.2 m/s, with a contact time of 0.008 seconds. The correct formula for average acceleration (Aavg) is Aavg = (Vf - Vi) / t, leading to an average acceleration of -1850 m/s², indicating direction to the left. Participants clarify that the sign change is essential for accurate direction representation and emphasize the importance of impulse in understanding the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics, specifically average acceleration calculations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of initial and final velocity
  • Knowledge of impulse and momentum principles
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving time intervals in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of impulse and its relation to momentum in physics
  • Learn how to apply the formula F = I/t in collision scenarios
  • Explore the effects of varying forces during short time intervals in collisions
  • Practice problems involving average acceleration with different initial and final velocities
USEFUL FOR

High school physics students, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions and acceleration in physics.

shizupple
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I searched the forum before posting and couldn't seem to find anything on the acceleration off a wall that wasnt dealing with force as well.


Homework Statement


A tennis ball with a velocity of +9.6 m/s to the right is thrown perpendicularly at a wall. After striking the wall, the ball rebounds in the opposite direction with a velocity of -5.2 m/s (to the left). If the ball is in contact with the wall for 0.008 s, what is the average acceleration of the ball while it is in contact with the wall?

Vi=9.6m/s
Vf=-5.2m/s
t=.008s


Homework Equations


Aavg = Vf-Vi / Tf-Ti
Vf = Vi+a(Tf-Ti)


The Attempt at a Solution


9.6-5.2 / .008 = 550 m/s^2 left ?
I realize that answer is nowhere close to correct. I must be using an incorrect formula because its dealing with the wall. If anyone could guide me to a correct formula that would be awesome! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is actually correct (unless the book says it isn't). Collisions produce a large amount of force that varies through a small interval of time (this, I think, could be modeled under the Dirac delta). However, the force varies throughout the time interval, so the acceleration upon leaving the wall is probably not 550 m/s^2; this value, however, looks to be the average acceleration across the time interval (which is what you're asked for).

If you want to look this sort of thing up under the forums or anywhere else, it would usually fall under impulse or momentum.
 
Hmm well i tried entering 550 (m/s^2) left (on webassign) and it said the 550 was wrong but the direction was correct? I just don't see how it can be accelerating at 550 m/s^2 when it is pretty much in contact with the wall?
 
Sorry about that - I didn't do the math so I overlooked it...your method is correct, but remember that the final velocity is in the opposite direction of the initial, so the two values should have opposite signs. It looks like the actual answer is even larger than 550m/s^2.

shizupple said:
Hmm well i tried entering 550 (m/s^2) left (on webassign) and it said the 550 was wrong but the direction was correct? I just don't see how it can be accelerating at 550 m/s^2 when it is pretty much in contact with the wall?

Try to think of the amount of force needed to send a ball coming at you at 10m/s in the opposite direction with a speed of 6m/s all in the range of .008s.
 
Last edited:
we haven't talked about force yet. I'm in a high school honors physics class. there shouldn't need to be anything dealing with force in this problem though should there? its just acceleration? and are you saying i need to change the sign on the 550 or i need to do (9.6+5.2)/.008 = 1850? And the time interval is not .008s, that is the time it is in contact with the wall.
 
shizupple said:
we haven't talked about force yet. I'm in a high school honors physics class. there shouldn't need to be anything dealing with force in this problem though should there? its just acceleration? and are you saying i need to change the sign on the 550 or i need to do (9.6+5.2)/.008 = 1850? And the time interval is not .008s, that is the time it is in contact with the wall.

(9.6+5.2)/.008 = 1850 - this is right (and the direction is to the left). Just know that the ball accelerated from 9.6m/s in one direction to 5.2m/s in the opposite direction in a time interval of .008s.
 
Wow! This is amazing. I would have never thought that was right. Thats crazy to think that its accelerating at 1850 m/s^2 in .008s. Thanks for your help!
 
shizupple said:
Wow! This is amazing. I would have never thought that was right. Thats crazy to think that its accelerating at 1850 m/s^2 in .008s. Thanks for your help!

Why wouldn't it be (-5.2m/s - 9.6m/s)/(.008s)= -1850m/s/s. The negative tells you it's to the left. Am I wrong for thinking this way?
 
pr0blumz said:
Why wouldn't it be (-5.2m/s - 9.6m/s)/(.008s)= -1850m/s/s. The negative tells you it's to the left. Am I wrong for thinking this way?

You're doing it the more precise way...though it is relatively the same as saying 1850m/s/s to the left (the negative indicates to the left).
 
  • #10
hello shizupple! i read through the post and in the 1st post you said acceleration off the wall. personally i think its the wrong concept if you are using projectile motion to solve this problem. I think the question is trying to ask something like F=I/t where I is impluse. Although you get the same answer but i believe that is the correct concept just my 20c ::biggrin::
 
  • #11
semc said:
hello shizupple! i read through the post and in the 1st post you said acceleration off the wall. personally i think its the wrong concept if you are using projectile motion to solve this problem. I think the question is trying to ask something like F=I/t where I is impluse. Although you get the same answer but i believe that is the correct concept just my 20c ::biggrin::

Oh ok. Well we haven't talked about any of that yet. I'm just in a high school honors physics class.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K