Electric Dipole in B Field: No Torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    B field Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An electric dipole in a magnetic field (B field) does not experience torque when it is stationary, as there is no electric field present. If the dipole is moving without rotation, it will not experience torque but will feel a force on its center of mass. Conversely, if the dipole rotates, it will experience torque but no net force. The general formulas governing these interactions are given by F = ((ω × d) × B) for force and M = d × (v × B) for torque, where d represents the dipole moment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipoles and their properties
  • Familiarity with magnetic fields and their effects on charged particles
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically cross products
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics, including force and torque
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of electric fields on dipoles in conjunction with magnetic fields
  • Learn about the dynamics of rotating rigid bodies in electromagnetic fields
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of torque and force equations for dipoles
  • Investigate applications of dipole dynamics in physics, such as in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the behavior of electric dipoles in magnetic fields.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
If i have an electric dipole in a B field, it won't experience a torque right.
Because the electric dipole is not moving. So it should just stay put.
Just want to check my understanding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as there is no electric field in the system of the dipole (and ignoring stuff like gravity and so on), it does not feel any force/torque.
 
ok thanks for your answer, but if the dipole was moving then it would experience a torque.
 
It depends on the way in which it moves. The dipole would only experience a torque on it if it were rotating with respect to the B field. If the dipole was moving without rotation, it would not experience a torque but would experience a force on its center of mass. If it was only rotating, it would feel a torque but not a force on its center of mass.
 
Are you sure about that? I got confused by trying to combine B,v,d in my mind, so I calculated it:

Represent the dipole by a positive charge q at position a=(a_x,a_y,a_z) and a negative charge -q at position -a.

A velocity \vec{v} of the dipole generates the total force \vec{F}=\vec{F_q}+\vec{F_{-q}}=q(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})+(-q)(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})=0.
The torque based on this movement is \vec{M}=\vec{a} \times \vec{F_q} - \vec{a} \times \vec{F_{-q}}=2q \vec{a} \times(\vec{v} \times \vec{B})
Another way to see this is to transform the problem in the system of the dipole: The magnetic field gets an added electric component, which can generate a torque but not a net force.


Now, let the dipole rotate with angular velocity \vec{\omega}. The positive charge then moves with \vec{\omega} \times \vec{a} and the negative charge with the negative value of that.

Therefore, the total force is \vec{F}=\vec{F_q}+\vec{F_{-q}}=q\left((\vec{\omega} \times \vec{a}) \times \vec{B}\right)+(-q)\left(((\vec{\omega} \times -\vec{a}) \times \vec{B}\right)=2q \left((\vec{\omega} \times \vec{a}) \times \vec{B}\right)
The torque is \vec{M}=\vec{a} \times \vec{F_q} - \vec{a} \times \vec{F_{-q}}=0 by symmetry as \vec{F_q}=\vec{F_{-q}}.

Replacing 2qa by the dipole moment d and allowing both movement and rotation at the same time finally gives the general formulas:

\vec{F}=\left((\vec{\omega} \times \vec{d}) \times \vec{B}\right)
\vec{M}= \vec{d} \times (\vec{v} \times \vec{B})

I wonder how the solutions of these equations (together with J d/dt omega = M and m d/dt v = F) look like.
 
mfb said:
Are you sure about that? I got confused by trying to combine B,v,d in my mind, so I calculated it:

Represent the dipole by a positive charge q at position a=(a_x,a_y,a_z) and a negative charge -q at position -a.

You are correct. I somehow was thinking about a dipole with the same signed charge on both ends (that's last time I comment before my coffee).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K