The discussion revolves around the portrayal of science in various science fiction media, including movies and television shows. Participants share examples of what they perceive as "bad science" in these works, often highlighting inaccuracies or implausibilities in the scientific concepts presented.
Participants generally share a consensus on the presence of bad science in various sci-fi works, but there is no clear agreement on specific examples or the extent of the inaccuracies. The discussion remains largely unresolved, with multiple competing views on what constitutes "bad science."
Limitations include varying definitions of what constitutes scientific accuracy, subjective interpretations of entertainment value, and the blending of humor with critique in the discussion.
This discussion may be of interest to fans of science fiction, those studying media representation of science, and individuals curious about the intersection of entertainment and scientific principles.
Evo said:Ah yes, Xev.
Evo said:Yes, her hair was shorter the first season she was on.
Just this past couple weeks they were airing episodes I'd never seen before and which I assumed were new. Each one had a very well known guest actor, like one had Rutger Hauer. In these episodes Xev is played by a blonde I'd never seen before. Not the woman in the picture you posted.Evo said:Yes, like the x in xylophone.
This actress is the most recent. The pilot had a blond actress, but she was killed and then reconstructed into the current Xev.