Ball hitting racket - Momentum Question (ENGAA 2017)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the momentum calculation of a ball hitting a racket, specifically addressing the correct application of the impulse-momentum theorem. The correct answer to the problem is derived using the formula F = (change in momentum) / (change in time), with the change in momentum expressed as mv - mu. The key error identified is the sign of the force, which must be negative when considering the direction of the initial and final velocities. The final momentum is correctly calculated as mv = F(t2 - t1) - mu, ensuring the proper directionality of the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the impulse-momentum theorem
  • Familiarity with vector notation in physics
  • Knowledge of momentum calculations in one-dimensional motion
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate equations involving force and time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impulse-momentum theorem in detail
  • Learn about vector forces and their applications in physics
  • Practice momentum calculations with varying initial and final velocities
  • Explore examples of one-dimensional collisions and their momentum implications
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics examinations, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding momentum and impulse in physical systems.

TomK
Messages
69
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
ENGAA 2017 - Question 52
Relevant Equations
Force = rate of change of momentum
Please scroll-sown to Question 52: https://www.undergraduate.study.cam.ac.uk/files/publications/engineering_s1_qp_2017.pdf

The correct answer is 'B'. This is the working I did:

F = (change in momentum) / (change in time)

change in momentum = mv - mu, where v = final velocity and u = initial velocity

initial velocity = +u, final velocity = -v (as velocity reverses direction after hitting racket)

change in time = t2 - t1m (-v - (+u)) = F (t2 - t1)
-mv - mu = Ft2 - Ft1
mv = Ft1 - Ft2 - mu
mv = F (t1 - t2) - mu

As you can see, my answer is wrong. I don't understand why. What's strange is that if you assume final velocity = +v and initial velocity = -u, you'll get the change in momentum to be m (v - (-u)) = mv + mu. Then, you'll get the right answer after rearranging.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TomK said:
As you can see, my answer is wrong. I don't understand why. What's strange is that if you assume final velocity = +v and initial velocity = -u, you'll get the change in momentum to be m (v - (-u)) = mv + mu. Then, you'll get the right answer after rearranging.
What's strange about that?
 
PeroK said:
What's strange about that?

Why does it work one way but not the other? The velocities are still in opposite directions. What error have I made?
 
Try using vector. Then you will definitely get the right answer. Focus on the initial direction of the ball.
 
TomK said:
Why does it work one way but not the other? The velocities are still in opposite directions. What error have I made?
First, let's analyse your answer. Note that you are asked for the magnitude of the final momentum. You have: $$mv = F(t_1 - t_2) - mu$$ From the question ##u## is a speed, hence positive, as is ##F## and ##t_1 < t_2##. So, the expression you have on the right-hand side is negative. Which simply cannot be a magnitude. You should, therefore, have taken the modulus of this in any case to get a possible answer.

Second, let's analyse the question. If the initial speed ##u = 0##, then the magnitude of the final momentum is: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1)$$
Now, what happens when ##u > 0##? Is the final momentum greater or smaller? The force must first stop the ball and then accelerate it, so some of the impulse is used to get the ball to rest, leaving less impulse to accelerate it. That means we have to take away the ##mu##, leaving: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1) - mu$$ Note that we have used the assumption that ##F(t_2 - t_1) > mu##.

Finally, as suggested above, you could do a vector calculation. In which case, you need to use a vector for force. And, depending on the direction you take as positive, you will have ##\vec F = \pm F##. And that's your mistake. You take the force to be positive, regardless of the direction you consider as positive for your velocities. In one case you get the right answer, but when ##F## has the wrong sign you get the wrong answer.
 
PeroK said:
First, let's analyse your answer. Note that you are asked for the magnitude of the final momentum. You have: $$mv = F(t_1 - t_2) - mu$$ From the question ##u## is a speed, hence positive, as is ##F## and ##t_1 < t_2##. So, the expression you have on the right-hand side is negative. Which simply cannot be a magnitude. You should, therefore, have taken the modulus of this in any case to get a possible answer.

Second, let's analyse the question. If the initial speed ##u = 0##, then the magnitude of the final momentum is: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1)$$
Now, what happens when ##u > 0##? Is the final momentum greater or smaller? The force must first stop the ball and then accelerate it, so some of the impulse is used to get the ball to rest, leaving less impulse to accelerate it. That means we have to take away the ##mu##, leaving: $$mv = F(t_2 - t_1) - mu$$ Note that we have used the assumption that ##F(t_2 - t_1) > mu##.

Finally, as suggested above, you could do a vector calculation. In which case, you need to use a vector for force. And, depending on the direction you take as positive, you will have ##\vec F = \pm F##. And that's your mistake. You take the force to be positive, regardless of the direction you consider as positive for your velocities. In one case you get the right answer, but when ##F## has the wrong sign you get the wrong answer.

Thank you. I now know I should have given F a '-' sign in-front, since force is acting in the negative direction, as I assumed positive to be right to left.

initial velocity = +u
final velocity = -v

F = change in p/change in t

-F = (-mv - mu)/(t2 - t1)
-F(t2 - t1) = -mv - mu

mv = F(t2 - t1) - mu
This is the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K