Ball launched throught semicircular chute

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaded18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball launched up a semicircular chute, where it experiences a centripetal acceleration of magnitude 2g at the top before entering free fall. The distance from the bottom to the top of the chute is given as 2R, and the question asks how far from the bottom the ball lands.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of velocity and time of flight, with some attempting to derive these values using kinematic equations and circular motion principles. There is also exploration of different values for acceleration and questioning of the problem's wording.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing calculations and visual aids. There is a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the interpretation of the centripetal acceleration and its implications for the calculations. Some participants express frustration while others offer alternative approaches to understanding the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the distinction between centripetal acceleration and gravitational acceleration, as well as the implications of the problem's parameters on the calculations. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the problem statement.

jaded18
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
I don't get it!

problem: A ball is launched up a semicircular chute in such a way that at the top of the chute, just before it goes into free fall, the ball has a centripetal acceleration of magnitude 2g. And the distance between the bottom and the top of the chute is 2R.

How far from the bottom of the chute does the ball land?

I realize it is just another projectile motion prob. I calculated the velocity to be (2gR)^(1/2) using the formula (m=v2/radius) for circular motion. and the time was derived using kinematic equation (t=(2R/g)^(1/2)). I DON'T KNOW WHAT I AM DOING WRONG. Sorry, but I'm so frustrated. Is there anyone out there who can solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really couldn't visualize the question, so I can't solve this.

But if you know the answer, try 3gR or gR instead of 2gR
or changing values a bit(like plugging different values, like 3gR for 2gR), and when you find the answer, with correct values..then just try to find the meaning... that's what I do when I don't get right answers.
 
The time to fall a distance 2R at an acceleration of g satisfies 2R=(1/2)gt^2 so I get t=sqrt(4R/g). The acceleration of gravity is still g, not 2g.
 
2.828R ... is that the answer? i think dick, that you are right about the time being t=sqrt(4R/g) . but my calculation for velocity is correct right? SO if the two values of time and velocity are correct and i multiply them together, i will get 2.828R. How does this look guys?
 
oh. the formula for circular motion is (a=v2/radius) not (m=v2/radius)!
 
jaded18 said:
hey guys, thanks for the quick response. i don't know if this link will work, but here's something that will visualize the problem: http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1010888/25/M2K_ca_7.jpg

and dick, the acceleration of gravity is 2g. that wasn't a typo. that's the exact wording of the problem

The acceleration of gravity isn't 2g, the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration is 2g.
 
yea, i also 2Rsqrt(2)

"the ball has a centripetal acceleration of magnitude 2g."

but you wrote it urself that it's a[c]
 
Last edited:
jaded18 said:
2.828R ... is that the answer? i think dick, that you are right about the time being t=sqrt(4R/g) . but my calculation for velocity is correct right? SO if the two values of time and velocity are correct and i multiply them together, i will get 2.828R. How does this look guys?

If that's sqrt(8)*R, yes.
 
  • #10
yes, thanks a lot for clearing that up ^ I have taken that into consideration and reworked the prob. i just need to know if i was successful or if i was still having problems: anyone know if the answer is 2.828R??
 
  • #11
Thanks! You guys are too cool :)
 
  • #12
np,
try to get perfect at that technique (I decribed in #2) lol
It saves a lot of time, and always helps when you need some preferential answer(like in lab's experiments)!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K