Ball rolling and bouncing from a wall

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a ball of mass m that rolls without sliding and collides with a wall, initially traveling at velocity v1 and subsequently at velocity v2. Participants are exploring the energy loss during this collision and the implications of rotational and translational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity, questioning the validity of assuming that the ball continues to rotate without sliding during the collision. There are considerations about the role of friction and how it affects the ball's motion before and after the impact.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants suggest that friction is necessary for the ball to maintain its rolling motion, while others question the assumptions made about the collision dynamics and energy conservation. There is no explicit consensus on the implications of friction or the nature of the energy loss.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem statement has evolved, with clarifications regarding the presence of friction and the nature of the collision. There is an emphasis on the need for precise definitions and conditions under which the problem is being analyzed.

Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A ball of mass m rotates without sliding at velocity v1 and hits a wall. it rotates backwards at velocity v2. what is the energy loss.

Homework Equations


Kinetic energy of a rigid body: ##E=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2##
Moment of inertia of a ball round it's center: ##I=\frac{2}{5}mr^2##

3. The Attempt at a Solution

$$\Delta E=\frac{1}{2}m(v_2^2-v_1^2)+\frac{1}{2}I(\omega^2_2-\omega^2_1)$$
$$\omega r=v\rightarrow \omega^2=\frac{v^2}{r^2}$$
$$\Delta E=\frac{1}{2}m(v_2^2-v_1^2)+\frac{1}{2}\frac{2}{5}mr^2\cdot\left( \frac{v_2^2-v_1^2}{r^2} \right)$$
$$\Delta E=\frac{1}{2}m(v_2^2-v_1^2)\left( 1+\frac{2}{5} \right)$$
 

Attachments

  • Snap1.jpg
    Snap1.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 440
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if you are supposed to assume ##\omega r = v##. If there is no friction, why should ##\omega## change during the collision?
To make it worse, why should this relation hold before the collision?
 
My mistake, i corrected in the OP, it rotates without sliding, sorry
 
Okay, then ignore the second comment, the first one is still valid.
 
I think it's more complicated to solve, because at higher speeds the ball will have so much rotational energy forward, that it will jump backwards, having hit the wall.
The rotational energy will be converted to "jumping energy".
Some moving pattern like this: ( moving forward / moving backward ):

|∩∩∩∩∩∩∩ >
|--------------------------- <

( wall to the left )
 
It won't jump without friction.
 
But i still think, because of the wording of the question, that also in the first stage at v1 it rotates without sliding
 
You added that to the problem statement, so I guess it is true... yes.
It will slide after the collision, however.
 
mfb said:
It will slide after the collision, however.
Why are you sure? if it will slide then it won't rotate fast enough for v2, but why do you say that?
Because of the collision i don't know if the angular momentum's magnitude is preserved and only the direction has changed, so i don't know nothing!
 
  • #10
There is nothing that could change its rotation, as we don't have friction.
Edit: You removed the "without friction" from post 1.
Please post the full and exact problem statement.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
Please post the full and exact problem statement.
A ball of mass m rolls without sliding and hits a vertical wall with velocity v1. the ball's velocity after the collision is v2. what is the amount of energy that was emitted in the collision.
 
  • #12
Karol said:
A ball of mass m rolls without sliding and hits a vertical wall with velocity v1. the ball's velocity after the collision is v2. what is the amount of energy that was emitted in the collision.
If there is unlimited friction with the ground but none with the wall, and we allow the rebound to take a little time instead of being instantaneous, that is all feasible and leads to your answer in the OP.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
If there is unlimited friction with the ground but none with the wall, and we allow the rebound to take a little time instead of being instantaneous, that is all feasible and leads to your answer in the OP.
And if there's friction with the wall? will the fact that the force from the wall can be in any angle make a difference? is that, the change in the direction of the reaction, the only effect of the friction in the wall?
 
  • #14
Karol said:
And if there's friction with the wall? will the fact that the force from the wall can be in any angle make a difference? is that, the change in the direction of the reaction, the only effect of the friction in the wall?
If there is any friction with the wall then the ball will become airborne on the rebound.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
If there is any friction with the wall then the ball will become airborne on the rebound.
What is airborne? do you mean it will be a little time in the air like in the drawing? and why are sure that it will lift the ball off the ground, maybe the force won't be strong enough, or it doesn't matter if it will completely lift it or not? and what does it matter if the ball is airborne if we address to the later situation when it stabilizes and continues to roll without sliding?
 

Attachments

  • Snap1.jpg
    Snap1.jpg
    5.2 KB · Views: 400
  • #16
Karol said:
why are sure that it will lift the ball off the ground
If the rebound takes a short time then the forces will be large, much larger than mg. If there is friction from the wall then its maximum value will be in proportion to the rebound force. Angular momentum about the point of impact on the wall will be preserved.
If the friction is so great that it does not slip against the wall during rebound then you can deduce the vertical velocity that results.
Karol said:
what does it matter if the ball is airborne if we address to the later situation when it stabilizes and continues to roll without sliding?
As long as v2 refers to the velocity when it has resumed rolling, it does not matter.
 
  • #17
Thanks but why, if the collision takes time, there isn't conservation of energy, am i right?
Does the stage of acceleration consume all the difference in energies?
So if the change in velocities is instantaneous there isn't acceleration and no losses?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K