Ballet Performance | Ravel's Bolero

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom.G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
AI Thread Summary
Bolero is recognized as both a genre of music and a specific orchestral work by Maurice Ravel. The piece is notable for its gradual crescendo, starting softly and culminating in a powerful finale, which lasts approximately 15 minutes. Many listeners associate Ravel's Boléro with significant cultural events, particularly in the UK after 1984. The composition's unique structure and emotional impact make it a memorable experience for audiences, often evoking strong feelings during performances.
Tom.G
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,661
Reaction score
4,504
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Lnewqban
Science news on Phys.org
Lnewqban said:

Interesting! I never knew bolero was a whole genre, I only knew it as a particular piece by Ravel.


A Google search for bolero has an entry:

What is bolero famous for?
ANd9GcQn7Q66UYtJsP-lJWp8Kq3AB9RKJfcVXM9yyAp-sska&s.jpg


Boléro, one-movement orchestral work composed by Maurice Ravel and known for beginning softly and ending, according to the composer's instructions, as loudly as possible.


I once lived just far enough from my workplace that the drive time was the same as the Ravel piece. The way it builds over the 15 minutes coincided nicely, and effectively, with waking up by the time I got to the office!
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Lnewqban
I thought it was just one classical piece too. Everyone in the UK associated that music with one event after 1984. It is still very moving watching it just now.

 
There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Back
Top