Ballistic Pendulum Lab: Solving for Cart Speed

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics lab involving a ballistic pendulum that strikes a cart, with the goal of determining the cart's speed based on the pendulum's height. The initial approach suggests using gravitational potential energy converted to kinetic energy to find the pendulum's speed at the bottom of its swing. However, concerns arise about the appropriateness of using the elastic collision formula, as some participants argue that momentum conservation should be prioritized in this scenario. It is emphasized that the system is isolated, and the pendulum's post-collision behavior must be measured to accurately calculate momentum. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of the collision type and the experimental setup.
fomenkoa
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi all

We are doing a physics lab where we lift a pendulum to a certain height, let go of it, and the pendulum strikes a physics cart on a track. A lightgate then measures the velocity of the cart.

We need to figure out the speed of the cart given the distance the pendulum is raised by

I think you do it like this:
At the top, the pendulum's energy is all mgh
at the bottom of the swing, the pendulum's energy is all kinetic, so it is now all 0.5 m v^2 from this, we can figure out its speed at the bottom

The pendulum's mass and speed at the bottom of swing is now known. The cart's mass is known and it starts from rest.

Then you just plug values into the formula for elastic collisions:

(2 * m1 / (m1+m2) )* speed of pendulum at bottom) = speed of cart




Is this correct? It seems too simple since the lab is supposed to be harder than this. Can one actually use the elastic collision formula?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, please read https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=846832#post846832" thread so to better format your equation.

Anytime I see the expression (m1 + m2) in an expression about a collision I think inelastic. Could you please show us the derivation of your final velocity expression?

EDIT: Did your experimental numbers agree with your expression?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would guess that one would rather use conservation of momentum. You have an isolated system assuming that the pendulum hits the cart on the same height as its center of mass and the cart has negligible friction. Therefore momentum will be conserved. The pendulum will probably swing back upwards after the collision. You need to measure the amount by which it swung upwards in order to calculate the momentum of the pendulum after the collision.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
18K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
9K