Ballistic problem: reachable region

  • Thread starter Thread starter snellslaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ballistic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a ballistic problem concerning the reachable region of a projectile, specifically focusing on the equations related to projectile motion and their derivations. Participants reference external sources to clarify the relationships between variables such as range, initial speed, and launch angle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the origins of specific equations related to projectile motion and question their validity. There is an examination of the relationship between range and height, with attempts to reconcile different expressions for these variables. Some participants express confusion regarding the conditions under which certain equations hold true.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on the mathematical relationships involved. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the equations, and while some guidance has been offered, no consensus has been reached on the validity of the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, referencing specific equations and their derivations while questioning assumptions about the projectile's motion and the conditions under which these equations apply.

snellslaw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • ballistic.JPG
    ballistic.JPG
    4 KB · Views: 572
Physics news on Phys.org
no, it looks like the 2D region of all points that the projectile can pass through with initial speed vo
 
Thanks! could you please explain further how you know this to be true?
If you look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trajectory#Range_and_height
I'm assuming x is the max range R?
Then y = vi2sin2(θ)/2g = vi2/2g * (1 - cos2(θ))
Now if this were to match the equation in OP, then we need
vi2cos2(θ)/2g = gR2/2vi2
But subbing in R = vi2sin(2θ)/g, we get
vi2cos2(θ)/2g = vi2sin2(2θ)/2g
But cos2(θ) =/= sin2(2θ)
 
Last edited:
hi snellslaw! :smile:
snellslaw said:
Then y = vi2sin2(θ)/2g = vi2/2g * (1 - cos2(θ))

where does this come from? surely y = 0 ? :confused:

if you put x = v2sin(2θ)/g into the equation, and θ = 45°, you do get y = 0 :wink:
 
Thanks tiny-tim! :D
I think the line you quoted was not my question however;
we need vi2cos2(θ)/2g = gR2/2vi2
but this leads to cos2(θ) = sin2(2θ) which is not an equality.

Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K