Baryons and their quark constituents

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atomos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baryons Quark
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the properties of baryons, specifically the delta baryon with a charge of +1 and a spin of 3/2, composed of two up quarks and one down quark. It clarifies that spins are not simply additive as one might assume; rather, they are represented as spinors, leading to different combination rules. The conversation emphasizes that a system of three spin-1/2 particles can yield total spin states of either 1/2 or 3/2, depending on the alignment of their spins. This understanding is crucial for analyzing the spin characteristics of baryons derived from up, down, and strange quarks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of baryon properties and classifications
  • Familiarity with quark types: up, down, and strange
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics, specifically spin and spinors
  • Basic grasp of particle physics and baryon composition
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of baryons and their classification schemes
  • Study the concept of spinors in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the combinations of quarks and their implications on baryon spin states
  • Investigate the role of symmetry in particle physics, particularly in baryon formation
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in particle physics, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone studying the properties of baryons and their quark constituents.

Atomos
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
I have been given an assingment where I must show that the properties of the up, down and strange quarks follow from the properties of the baryons. I am just wondering why delta +1 (a baryon) has a spin 3/2 when it is, like a proton, composed of up, up, down. Aren't spins additive? and how do all of the 3/2 and 1/2 spin baryons follow from the combination of the up, down, and strange quarks alone? I can count only 10 combinations of those 3 types.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think spins are additive in the sense of 1/2+1/2+1/2=3/2 you would be wrong. And if you do think this you should be wondering why the proton has spin 1/2 rather than 3/2. A system of three spin 1/2 particles can be in a total spin state of either 1/2 or 3/2.
 
spins are "additive" but they are not numbers, they are spinors. addition rules are different.. but still makes a lot sense, eg. spin +1/2 and spin -1/2 adds to spin 0 (this is just means the spins of the two constitutents are anti-align. so with 3 spins states, you can have \pm 1/2 \text{or} \pm 3/2 that means you get a spin 1/2 or 3/2 particle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K