Bases of vector spaces and change of basis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the representation of vectors in n-dimensional vector spaces using ordered bases. It establishes that any vector v in a vector space V can be expressed as a linear combination of basis vectors v_i, with components a_i. The isomorphism between V and ℝⁿ is defined, allowing for the representation of basis vectors in a manner that resembles the standard basis in ℝⁿ. The conversation also references Nadir Jeevanjee's book, "An Introduction to Tensors & Group Theory for Physicists," which discusses the representation of basis vectors in their defining basis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of n-dimensional vector spaces
  • Familiarity with linear combinations and basis vectors
  • Knowledge of isomorphisms in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of matrix representation of vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of linear transformations and their matrix representations
  • Learn about the properties of isomorphisms in vector spaces
  • Explore the standard basis in ℝⁿ and its applications
  • Read Nadir Jeevanjee's "An Introduction to Tensors & Group Theory for Physicists" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying linear algebra and vector spaces, particularly those interested in the applications of basis transformations and matrix representations.

"Don't panic!"
Messages
600
Reaction score
8
Hi all,

Just doing a bit of personal study on vector spaces and wanted to clear up my understanding on the following. This is my description of what I'm trying to understand, is it along the right lines? (apologies in advance, I am a physicist, not a pure mathematician, so there are most probably errors in the mathematical formalism I've used below):Given an n-dimensional vector space V and an ordered basis E= \left[\mathbf{v}_{i}\right]_{i=1,2,\ldots ,n}, one can represent any vector \mathbf{v}\in V with respect to this basis as a linear combination \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \mathbf{v}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i}\mathbf{v}_{i} where a_{i} are the components of \mathbf{v} with respect to the basis vectors \mathbf{v}_{i}.We can define an isomorphism between V and \mathbb{R}^{n}, f:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{n} such that, with respect to the basis E
\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i}\mathbf{v}_{i} \;\; \longmapsto \;\; \left(\begin{matrix}a_{1} \\ a_{2} \\ \vdots \\ a_{n}\end{matrix}\right) Denoting this isomorphism as
\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \left[\mathbf{v}\right]_{E} = \left(\begin{matrix}a_{1} \\ a_{2} \\ \vdots \\ a_{n}\end{matrix}\right) we observe that \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \left[\mathbf{v} +\mathbf{w} \right]_{E} = \left[\mathbf{v} \right]_{E} +\left[\mathbf{w} \right]_{E} \;\;\forall \,\mathbf{v},\mathbf{w} \in V and
\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \left[c\mathbf{v} \right]_{E} = c\left[\mathbf{v} \right]_{E} \;\;\forall \,\mathbf{v}\in V\;\;\text{and} \;\; c\in F where F is the underlying scalar field of V.

Given this, we have that \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \left[\mathbf{v}\right]_{E} = \left[\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i}\mathbf{v}_{i}\right]_{E} = \sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i} \left[\mathbf{v}_{i}\right]_{E} = \left(\begin{matrix}a_{1} \\ a_{2} \\ \vdots \\ a_{n}\end{matrix}\right) which implies that \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \left[\mathbf{v}_{i}\right]_{E} = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ \vdots \\ 1 \\ \vdots \\ 0\end{matrix}\right) where the only non-zero component is the i^{th} component with a value of unity. Hence, it can be seen that, using such an isomorphism, one can make the basis vectors of a given n-dimensional ordered basis, resemble the standard basis in \mathbb{R}^{n}. This is true for all such n-dimensional ordered bases for a given vector space V.

I am currently working my way through Nadir Jeevanjee's book "An Introduction to Tensors & Group Theory for Physicists" and in it he mentions that "given an ordered basis, it is always possible to represent the basis vectors, in the basis that they define, such that they resemble the standard basis" (in words close to that effect), and I'm just trying to make sense of the notion. (Please ignore the "change of basis" part of the title. I initially got a little over enthusiastic and subsequently realized discussing both in one thread might be a little too long-winded).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of that looks good to me. I guess I could nitpick some unusual notation. You denoted the ordered basis by ##[\mathbf v_i]_{i=1,\dots,n}##. I think ##(\mathbf v_i)_{i=1}^n## or ##\langle \mathbf v_i\rangle_{i=1}^n## is more appropriate, since (ordered) n-tuples are usually written as ##(x_1,\dots,x_n)## or ##\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle##.

You may be interested in the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=694922 I wrote about matrix representations of linear operators. Your post explains how to use an ordered basis to represent vectors as matrices. My post explains how to use two ordered bases to represent linear transformations as matrices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Fredrik, really appreciate you having a look over it and the advice. Cheers for the link, very informative :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
888
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K