Basic algebra responsible for brain fart

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for x in a chemical equilibrium problem, specifically focusing on the equation 5.10 = [(1+x)/(1-x)]^2. Participants are exploring algebraic techniques to isolate x and understand the implications of their solutions in the context of chemical concentrations.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for solving the equation, including cross-multiplication and taking square roots. Questions arise regarding the validity of using square roots and the implications of positive versus negative solutions in the context of concentration values.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on algebraic manipulation, while others are questioning the assumptions regarding the positivity of x and the implications of different solutions. There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions under which certain solutions are valid, particularly in relation to physical constraints in chemical equilibrium.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that x may represent a change in concentration, and there are discussions about the constraints on x based on initial concentrations. The original poster has not provided the full problem statement, which may limit the clarity of the discussion.

MurdocJensen
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve for x in a chemical equilibrium problem (college chem). Once x is found I have no problem finding equilibrium concentrations. What's important is below.

Homework Equations



5.10 = [(1+x)/(1-x)]^2 --------> x=.387 (right answer)

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to take the square root of the right side and cross multiply and solve for x that way, but I keep getting 1. I also tried to expand the numerator with the common denominator to see if I missed something, but solving for x that way eventually got me 1 also. I know there's something simple I'm missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cross multiplying should work. Then you can work out the squares (don't forget that (x + 1)^2 = x^2 + 2x + 1) and bring it to the form
a x^2 + b x + c = 0.
 
That worked awesomely! What I don't understand is why I wasn't able to work it out by taking the square root of both sides. Do you have any insight into that? Not sure if that question's too vague.
 
You can do that, but you may need to consider both positive and negative square root of 5.10,
 
Physical constraints may tell you that x must be positive - and, if x represents a concentration (I can't tell from your original question) then you know 0 < x < 1, and solving by taking square roots works fine, without the need to consider [itex]-\sqrt{5.10}[/itex]
 
That's not true statdad. The equation
[tex]\frac{1 + x}{1 - x} = -\sqrt{5.10}[/tex]
can still give a positive solution for x (there is a minus sign in the denominator) and, in fact, will.
 
CompuChip said:
That's not true statdad. The equation
[tex]\frac{1 + x}{1 - x} = -\sqrt{5.10}[/tex]
can still give a positive solution for x (there is a minus sign in the denominator) and, in fact, will.

Nope: if 0 < x < 1 as I specified, then

[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> 0 > -x & > -1 \\<br /> 1 > 1 - x & > 0<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]

and no negative term arises.
 
CompuChip said:
That's not true statdad. The equation
[tex]\frac{1 + x}{1 - x} = -\sqrt{5.10}[/tex]
can still give a positive solution for x (there is a minus sign in the denominator) and, in fact, will.
This is correct.
I am guessing this is an equilibrium problem involving an ICE table. If so, then i am going to assume x represents a change in concentration. One of the values obtained for x will not be possible as it will be greater than the initial concentration. Using the positive square-root, the solution should be x=.387. using the negative squareroot, the value for x obtained (if i computed correctly) should be x=2.59. concentrations can be greater than one but if any of the initial concentrations of reagents were smaller than 2.59M, then this value would not be possible, and then the only true solution would be x=.387M (assuming you are working in Molars). MurdocJensen could you post the full question so I could verify this?
Thanks
-Theorem
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K