MHB Basic Math - Learn the Basics of Mathematics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying a mathematical expression involving variables a, b, and c. The left-hand side is rewritten using the identity for the difference of squares, resulting in the equation (b+c)² - a² = λbc. The next step involves eliminating a² by applying the law of cosines, which expresses a² in terms of b, c, and the cosine of angle α. Participants are encouraged to fill in this substitution and simplify the resulting expression further. The conversation emphasizes foundational algebraic techniques and the application of trigonometric identities.
Ande Yashwanth
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20170509-154200-1.jpg
    Screenshot_20170509-154200-1.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 98
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Ande Yashwanth! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

First step would be to multiply out the left hand side.
Did you already do that?
Anyway, being smart about it, we can write the left hand side as:
$$(a+b+c)(b+c-a)=((b+c)+a)((b+c)-a)=(b+c)^2-a^2$$
So we get:
$$(b+c)^2-a^2=\lambda bc$$

Now we want to get rid of the $a^2$.
We can do so by applying the law of cosines:
$$a^2=b^2+c^2 - 2bc\cos\alpha$$
What would we get if we fill that in and simplify further? (Wondering)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top