Basic Notation Q's: x, y, z, u, f(x)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The_ArtofScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of mathematical notation, specifically the meanings of expressions like y(0)=1 and u=f(x, y, z). Participants explore the implications of these notations in the context of functions of one, two, and three variables, as well as their graphical representations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of y(0)=1 and its relationship to f(0)=1, suggesting a connection between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
  • Another participant explains that y can be considered a representation of f(x) in a graphing context, where y is dependent on x.
  • There is a discussion about u=f(x, y, z) being a function that assigns values based on three independent variables, with x, y, and z potentially representing spatial coordinates.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between f(x, y) and f(x, y, z), questioning the existence of an additional coordinate in three-dimensional space.
  • Another participant clarifies that f(x, y, z) represents a function of three variables, which cannot be easily visualized in a two-dimensional graph, and provides an analogy involving temperature at a point in space.
  • A later reply emphasizes that f(x, y) and f(x, y, z) cannot represent the same function simultaneously, as they denote functions of different numbers of variables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of functions and their variables, with some clarifying points while others remain uncertain about the implications of the notation. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the relationship between the different functions and their representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of visualizing functions of three or more variables, noting the challenges in representing these concepts graphically in lower dimensions.

The_ArtofScience
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
I don't know if this is a terribly ignorant question but I was wondering what exactly is y(0)=1? Is that like f(0)=1 where the x is 0 and the y is 1?

I'm also curious about the expression u=f(x, y, z). What is that exactly? How is it related to the x, y, z coordinates?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since you haven't said what you mean by "f" or "y", it's hard to be precise. IF you have some function f(x) (or g(t), h(u), etc.) that you want to graph on an xy-coordinate system, since it is standard to use the x-axis to represent the independent variable (x or t or u or whatever) and the y-axis to represent the dependent variable (f(x) or g(t) or h(u) or whatever), yes it is standard to y= f(x) or y(x) in place of f(x). If f(0)= 1 and you have assigned x to the independent variable and y to the dependent variable, perhaps for graphing purposes, then you would have y(0)= 1. On a graph, that would be a point exactly one unit above the origin on the y-axis.

u= f(x,y,z) is a function that assigns a value to each possible combination of three independent values. Although, like all of mathematics, it can be used in many different ways, it is a common application to think of x, y, z as coordinates that designate points in space. One specific application would be to think of u as air temperature. A coordinate system would assign three numbers to each point in space. u(x,y,z) would be the temperature at each point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you, Ivy. I really liked your explanation.

I'm still curious though, if f(x,y) represents z, then what would f(x,y,z) be? Its hard to imagine another coordinate in the xyz coordinate plane, and if there is another coordinate, I might be overlooking it.
 
f(x, y, z) is a function that gives a value for each point in space, rather than each point in a plane. The example that HallsOfIvy gave, is the function that assigns to every point in the room the air temperature at that point.

The problem with functions of three and more variables is that we cannot draw them because we don't have enough dimensions. A function f(x) of one variable, can be drawn in two dimensions (set up an x-axis, and for each point x draw the corresponding value f(x) directly above it on the y-axis). Functions of two variables can still be drawn: above each point in the plane, draw the function value on the z-axis, like https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/96/968788-0.png . But to draw a function of three variables, you would have to have four perpendicular axes. Unfortunately we only live in a three-dimensional space, so it's very hard imagining this (and impossible doing it intuitively, let along projecting it on a two-dimensional piece of paper). Best thing you can do is try to think of the temperature analogy. You can then extend this also to a function of four variables, f(x, y, z, t) which would give the air temperature in the room at a given point (x, y, z) and a time t.
Another way to look at it: consider a function like a slot machine. It has some number of input slots, which we label by arbitrary letters (x, y, z, ...) -- if you put numerical values on these slots the function machine spits out a value. For example, the function [itex]f(x) = x^2[/itex] has one input slot x: if I insert x = 3 it spits out 9 and if I put in x = 1/2 it spits out 1/4. The advantage of a function of one (two) variables is that it can be graphed, by putting all possible input values on the x-axis (x and y axes) and the corresponding output on the y (z) axis, which gives you an insight in how the number is produced (e.g. if I slightly increase x, what will happen to f(x)), an advantage you don't have in more dimensions (though, in more advanced mathematics there are ways to describe the behavior of arbitrary functions which are almost as good as drawing graphs).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The_ArtofScience said:
Thank you, Ivy. I really liked your explanation.

I'm still curious though, if f(x,y) represents z, then what would f(x,y,z) be? Its hard to imagine another coordinate in the xyz coordinate plane, and if there is another coordinate, I might be overlooking it.

I didn't say "f(x,y) represents z". f(x,y) is a function of two variables and may have nothing to do with 'z'. If could, for example, represent the temperature at some point (x,y) on a heated plate. It depends upon the application of the function.

Of course, you can't have both "z= f(x,y)" and "f(x,y,z)"- but that has nothing to do with z. You are using "f" to mean two different things; it can't be both a function of two variables and a function of three variables.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K