Basic question about Feynman Diagrams

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of vertices in Feynman diagrams, specifically whether a vertex can have more than three particles interacting at it. Participants explore the implications of interaction terms in the Lagrangian and their relation to the number of particles involved in these interactions, focusing on quantum electrodynamics (QED) and electroweak theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a vertex can have more than three particles, noting that most diagrams they have seen feature three arms.
  • Another participant asserts that gluons can indeed create a four-particle vertex.
  • A participant explains that interaction terms in the Lagrangian dictate the number of particles at a vertex, with trilinear terms leading to three-particle vertices and quadrilinear terms leading to four-particle vertices, citing examples from electroweak theory.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about interaction terms and asks whether vertices in basic QED and weak force processes are limited to three or can also be four.
  • A later reply clarifies that in QED, the interaction term involves three fields, thus resulting in three-particle vertices.
  • Another participant emphasizes that Feynman diagrams serve as calculational tools for Lagrangian terms rather than simple representations of particle collisions.
  • It is noted that simpler electroweak processes typically involve three-particle vertices, with specific examples provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the number of particles at a vertex is determined by the interaction terms in the Lagrangian, but there is no consensus on whether vertices can be exclusively three or four particles in basic QED and weak force processes, as some participants express uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a lack of familiarity with interaction terms in the Lagrangian, which may limit their understanding of the discussion. The conversation also reflects varying levels of expertise among participants, with some focusing on basic concepts while others delve into more complex theoretical aspects.

McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Can a vertex of a Feynman diagram have more than three particles going in or out from it? Assuming all other conservation laws are obeyed, of course. I haven't seen this being explicitly stated but all the Feynman vertices I have seen have three arms attached. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can indeed. For instance gluons can make a 4 vertex.
 
An interaction term in the Lagrangian which is trilinear leads to a 3-particle vertex, while one which is quadrilinear leads to a 4-particle vertex. These things occur for example in electroweak theory. The kinetic energy term for the W boson is 1/4 WμνWμν where Wμν = ∂μWν - ∂νWμ - gWμ x Wν, which leads among other things to a 4-particle WWWW vertex. Also there is a WWhh vertex from its interaction with the Higgs.
 
Thank you for the quick replies. I do not know about the interaction terms in the Lagrangian. I am just learning to draw Feynman Diagrams for basic QED and Weak Force processes. So, in these cases, are my vertices 3 vertices or 4 vertices or are both okay? Thank you.
 
McLaren Rulez said:
Thank you for the quick replies. I do not know about the interaction terms in the Lagrangian. I am just learning to draw Feynman Diagrams for basic QED and Weak Force processes. So, in these cases, are my vertices 3 vertices or 4 vertices or are both okay? Thank you.
In QED, the interaction term from the Lagrangian is e\bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu A_\mu \psi. Since three fields take part in the interaction, these are 3-vertices.
 
McLaren Rulez said:
I do not know about the interaction terms in the Lagrangian. I am just learning to draw Feynman Diagrams

But that's what Feynman diagrams are.

They are not little cartoons describing collisions between billiard-ball like particles. They are a calculational shorthand for terms in a Lagrangian.
 
The simpler electroweak processes are all three-vertices:
  • two fermions interacting with a W boson;
  • two fermions interacting with a Z boson; or
  • two fermions or a W boson interacting with a photon.
In general, the number of fields multiplied together in each Lagrangian term imply interactions with that number of particpants. If there are only two - in which case they will always be a field and conjugate of either the same field or its chiral partner, the term represents
  • a kinetic term, if it has one or more partial differential operators (eg \bar{\psi}\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi or F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}), or
  • a mass term, if not (eg m\bar{\psi}_L\psi_R).
(F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu} does have differential operators but they are "hidden" in its definition (F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^{\mu}A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu}A^{\mu})).
 
Thank you! I think I have a clearer picture in my head now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
944
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K