Basic question about sun's mass & orbit of planets

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob Weaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Orbit Planets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sun's mass loss and its implications for the gravitational field that holds the planets in orbit. Participants explore the potential consequences of this mass loss, including the sun's evolution into a red giant and the stability of planetary orbits over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the sun is losing mass as it converts mass to energy, which could weaken its gravitational field and affect planetary orbits.
  • Others argue that the sun will not lose enough mass to disrupt planetary orbits before it evolves into a red giant, suggesting that this event will occur first.
  • One participant mentions that calculations regarding the sun's mass loss and its effects have been performed, indicating that this is a recognized area of study.
  • Another participant questions the certainty of the sun becoming a red giant and seeks clarification on the evidence supporting this claim, suggesting reliance on observations of other stars.
  • There is a reference to the solar wind contributing to mass loss, with a specific rate mentioned, but the overall impact on the sun's mass is described as minimal over billions of years.
  • Some participants express familiarity with various stellar evolution terms, while others seek clarification on specific concepts like the main sequence and Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the sun's mass loss, with some emphasizing the eventual evolution into a red giant as a more pressing concern than the gradual loss of mass affecting planetary orbits. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the timeline and significance of these events.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference calculations and models related to stellar evolution, but the specifics of these calculations and their assumptions are not detailed in the discussion. There is also mention of observational evidence, but the nature of this evidence is not fully explored.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in astrophysics, stellar evolution, and the dynamics of planetary systems may find this discussion relevant.

Bob Weaver
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This came up on another website I read, and it got me to wondering, so I am certain someone here could answer this.

The sun is constantly losing mass, as it converts its mass to energy. As it loses mass, its gravitational field weakens, because the gravitational field of a body is directly related to its mass.

The gravitational field is what holds the planets in orbit around the sun. At some point, the mass of the sun decreases to a critical level, at which the sun's gravitational field is too weak to hold the planets in orbit any more, so they would just leave orbit and fly off into space.

When does this happen? Has anyone tried to calculate this? Or does some other event intervene before this happens?

Thanks for any answers or insight.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sun will not loose that much mass, calm down, don't panic ;-)

Sun will blow up to a red giant and die before it have lost so much mass due to fusion and solar winds that planet's can't be bound anymore.

An interesting thing is that due to the sun's mass loss, planets will get a larger radii in their orbits, thus maybe the most inner planets will survive to be swallowed by the volume increasing sun.

One of my teachers in astrophysis told me that such calculations have been performed.
 
Thank you for your reply. This brings up another basic question. (I know I could get the answers just by studying on my own and I will study it more.) How do we know for certain that the sun will go red giant? How do we know when that will happen? Just based on evidence of other stars? I need to buy a couple bags of ice the night before.
 
Bob Weaver said:
This came up on another website I read, and it got me to wondering, so I am certain someone here could answer this.

The sun is constantly losing mass, as it converts its mass to energy. As it loses mass, its gravitational field weakens, because the gravitational field of a body is directly related to its mass.

The gravitational field is what holds the planets in orbit around the sun. At some point, the mass of the sun decreases to a critical level, at which the sun's gravitational field is too weak to hold the planets in orbit any more, so they would just leave orbit and fly off into space.

When does this happen? Has anyone tried to calculate this? Or does some other event intervene before this happens?
Actually such calculations are around here at PF somewhere.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=223621

It's a common question, especially in some introductory courses in astrophysics or stellar astrophysics.

The Sun also produces a 'solar wind' of particles at a rate of about 10^-14 solar masses per year. In 4 billion years this amounts to about 0.001 percent of the Sun's mass . . .
http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q1491.html
http://www.Newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/ast99/ast99441.htm


Our understanding of stellar (and solar) evolution come from a combination of observation and theory, of which part is modelling (simulation) of the physics of stars. Is one familiar with the term 'main sequence' and Hertzsprung-Russell diagram?
 
I am familiar with the terms supernova, red giant, white dwarf, neutron star and black hole, but not the terms 'main sequence' or 'Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.'
 
OK thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
17
Views
4K