How Do Astrophysicists Measure Solar Mass Loss?

AI Thread Summary
Astrophysicists estimate that the Sun loses approximately 4 million tons of mass per second due to nuclear fusion, converting hydrogen into helium. This mass loss is primarily based on the Sun's luminosity and energy output, with additional contributions from coronal mass ejections. While theoretical models support this figure, the discussion raises questions about whether this mass loss has been experimentally verified through measurements of gravitational attraction over time. However, it is suggested that current instruments may not be sensitive enough to detect such small changes in gravitational force. Overall, the process of solar mass loss is well understood through theoretical calculations and simulations rather than direct experimental measurement.
japam
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
From nuclear theory and texts its known that every second 570 millions tons of hydrogen are converted to 566 millton hellium,hence Sun loss 4 mill tons of mass in a second. But ¿how do astrophicisist probe experimentally this number?,have they measured solar gravity field or Earth atraction variation during the years,for example? Are the instruments enough sensitive to detect this

JPAM
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Is that metric or short tons? There's a difference.

That is probably based on Luminosity of the sun - or power radiated. There are also occasional coronal mass ejections (CME's) in which a large mass is blown off the sun.

Let's assume metric tons - so the sun looses 4 MT/sec or 4 Gkg/s ( 4 billion kg/s)

Putting that into perspective - the sun mass is approximately 2 x 1030 kg, so the sun looses (4 E9)/(2 E 30) or 2 E-21 of it's mass per sec.

In one year, or ~3.156 E 7 seconds, the sun would lose 6.31 E-14 of it's mass, and in 5 billion years, the sun would lose only, 0.0003156 of it mass, excluding CME's.

ref: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/sunfact.html

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/sun/basics.html
 
4M T/s is about what you get if you use the energy output 3.8E26 J/s and E=mc^2.
The mass loss due to solar wind and gas ejection is much higher than this
 
.

Do you have the data about how much is bigger the mass loss by solar wind than for nuclear reactions?
Regarding my first post, i guess that astronomers made theoretical models and then calculated 4 million tons/sec of mass converted in energy, but my question is that this number can be or has been probed experimentally,measureing for example a very small diminishing in gravitational atraction of the Sun on the Earth or a satellite ,for a timelapse of various decades
 
nobody has done this. Instruments will probably never be sensitive enough but there is not much point anyway, its a reasonably well understood process, the reactions are simulated with particle accelerators
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top