Basis of a vector space - apparently simple problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the basis of a subset of $$ \mathbb{R}^3 $$ defined by the plane equation $$ 3x - 2y + 5z = 0 $$. Participants explore various approaches to find the basis, including methods related to nullspaces and row reduction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to start solving the problem and suggests using the matrix form $$ Av = b $$.
  • Another participant clarifies that finding a basis involves determining the nullspace of the matrix $$ \left [ \begin{matrix} 3 & -2 & 5 \end{matrix} \right ] $$, which represents the plane.
  • It is noted that the matrix has rank 1, indicating that its nullspace has dimension 2, which is consistent with the expectation for a plane.
  • Participants discuss the parametric form of the nullspace and how to express dependent variables in terms of free variables.
  • One participant provides an alternative method of solving the equation by manipulating it to express relationships between the variables, emphasizing the need for at least two free variables to determine the third.
  • Another participant suggests a specific form for the vectors spanning the plane, proposing vectors (5,0,-3) and (0,5,2) as a basis.
  • There is a request for clarification on the notation used for the nullspace, with one participant explaining that "N" refers to the parametric form of the nullspace rather than a matrix.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to finding the basis of the plane through the nullspace, but there are multiple methods and interpretations discussed, indicating that the discussion remains somewhat unresolved with competing views on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the formulation of the problem and the implications of the matrix rank. There are also discussions about the independence of the proposed basis vectors, which remain unverified within the thread.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in linear algebra, particularly those studying vector spaces and nullspaces, may find the discussion relevant.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am revising vector spaces and have got stuck on a problem that looks simple ... but ... no progress ...

Can anyone help me get started on the following problem ..

Determine the basis of the following subset of $$ \mathbb{R}^3 $$:

... the plane $$ 3x - 2y + 5z = 0 $$

From memory (I studied vector spaces a long time ago!) I suspect that the solution would involve expressing the problem (but how?) in the form $$ Av = b $$ and then forming the matrix $$(A|b)$$ and then reduce to reduced row echelon form ...

... but then, in this case, it seems that $$ Av = b $$ is as follows:

$$ Av = (3 \ -2 \ \ 5) (x \ y \ z)^T = 0 $$

... ... so we are dealing with reducing the matrix $$(3 \ -2 \ \ 5 \ 0)$$ ... ?

This does not seem right ... must have made a mistake in formulating the problem ...

Can someone please clarify this situation for me ...

Help would be appreciated

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing wrong here, you are on the right track. Finding a basis of the plane amounts to finding a basis of the nullspace of the following matrix (since that nullspace is the plane by definition):
$$\left [ \begin{matrix} 3 &-2 &5 \end{matrix} \right ]$$
So you row-reduce it as usual (don't be put off by the fact that it only has one row - apply the usual rules):
$$\left [ \begin{matrix} 1 &\frac{-2}{3} &\frac{5}{3} \end{matrix} \right ]$$
The matrix has rank $1$, and so its nullspace has dimension $2$ (as expected, it's a plane) and so it has two free variables, and is of the form:
$$N = \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} y + \frac{-5}{3} z \\ y \\ z \end{matrix} \right ]$$
And so:
$$N = \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} y \\ y \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ] + \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{-5}{3} z \\ 0 \\ z \end{matrix} \right ]$$
Which can be rewritten as:
$$N = y \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ] + z \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{-5}{3} \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{matrix} \right ]$$
And so we conclude that a basis of the nullspace of the matrix (and so, a basis of the plane) is:
$$\left \{ \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ], \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{-5}{3} \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{matrix} \right ] \right \}$$
 
Last edited:
Bacterius said:
There is nothing wrong here, you are on the right track. Finding a basis of the plane amounts to finding a basis of the nullspace of the following matrix (since that nullspace is the plane by definition):
$$\left [ \begin{matrix} 3 &-2 &5 \end{matrix} \right ]$$
So you row-reduce it as usual (don't be put off by the fact that it only has one row - apply the usual rules):
$$\left [ \begin{matrix} 1 &\frac{-2}{3} &\frac{5}{3} \end{matrix} \right ]$$
The matrix has rank $1$, and so its nullspace has dimension $2$ (as expected, it's a plane) and so it has one free variable, and is of the form:
$$N = \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} y + \frac{-5}{3} z \\ y \\ z \end{matrix} \right ]$$
And so:
$$N = \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} y \\ y \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ] + \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{-5}{3} z \\ 0 \\ z \end{matrix} \right ]$$
Which can be rewritten as:
$$N = y \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ] + z \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{-5}{3} \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{matrix} \right ]$$
And so we conclude that a basis of the nullspace of the matrix (and so, a basis of the plane) is:
$$\left \{ \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{2}{3} \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{matrix} \right ], \left [ \begin{matrix} \frac{-5}{3} \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{matrix} \right ] \right \}$$

Thanks Bacterius ... really appreciate your help...

But ... can you explain how you arrived at the matrix N and how it enters the process?

Peter
 
Peter said:
Thanks Bacterius ... really appreciate your help...

But ... can you explain how you arrived at the matrix N and how it enters the process?

Peter

N isn't a matrix, it's a vector. Actually it's the parametric form of the nullspace of the matrix $\left [ \begin{matrix} 3 &-2 &5 \end{matrix} \right ]$. You obtain it the usual way, by rewriting dependent variables in terms of free variables (here we have $1x + (-2/3)y + (5/3)z = 0$, and $x$ depends on $y$ and $z$, so $x = (2/3)y - (5/3)z$) and then separating the variables to obtain a basis for this nullspace. I thought I'd give it a name, $N$ seemed suitable :D
 
In "high-school" one would solve this like so:

$3x - 2y + 5z = 0$

$3x - 2y = -5z$

We have 1 equation, 3 unknowns. Picking any two values for $x,y$ determines $z$, picking any less than two values, isn't any help:

Suppose $x$ (for example), was known to be the constant $a$. This gives:

$-2y = -5z - 3a$ or equivalently:

$2y = 5z + 3a$. Now $\frac{3}{2}a$ is just another constant, let's call it $b$ for now. Dividing by 2 gives:

$y = \frac{5}{2}z + b$.

This is a line in the $yz$-plane, and as its slope is not 0, it takes on ALL values for $y$.

We could do this for each variable in turn, the results aren't all that illuminating, but they do tell us we need to know at least TWO variables to find the third. There is nothing restricting our choice (hence the name "free variables" or "free parameters").

On the other hand, if we know $x,y$ then $z = \frac{2}{5}y - \frac{3}{5}x$.

In other words, all of our vectors $(x,y,z)$ that satisfy this are of the form:

$\left(x,y,\frac{2}{5}y - \frac{3}{5}x\right) = x\left(1,0,-\frac{3}{5}\right) + y\left(0,1,\frac{2}{5}\right)$.

If one wants to avoid fractions, one can put then in the form:

$(5x,5y,2y-3x) = x(5,0,-3) + y(0,5,2)$, which means our plane is spanned by the vectors (5,0,-3) and (0,5,2).

Now, YOU need to show that this IS a linearly independent set (that (5,0,-3) and (0,5,2) do not lie on the SAME line through the origin).

As a sanity check note that if $(x,y,z) = (5,0,-3)$ that:

$3x -2y + 5z = 15 - 0 + -15 = 0$, and similarly for the other vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K