Bayesian network simplification.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter IttyBittyBit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bayesian Network
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the simplification of Bayesian networks, specifically the approximation of a subset of binary nodes, denoted as A, into a single non-binary node with multiple states. The nodes in A are strongly anticorrelated, meaning that if one node is true, the probability of others being true is nearly zero. The discussion seeks to determine whether this approximation technique is common and what approximation error bounds can be expected. Additionally, the conversation explores the converse scenario of reducing a many-state node into several binary nodes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bayesian networks and their structure
  • Knowledge of probability theory, particularly anticorrelation
  • Familiarity with node state representation in probabilistic models
  • Experience with approximation techniques in statistical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Bayesian network simplification techniques and their applications
  • Explore approximation error bounds in probabilistic models
  • Study the implications of anticorrelation in Bayesian networks
  • Investigate methods for converting many-state nodes into binary nodes
USEFUL FOR

Data scientists, statisticians, and researchers working with probabilistic models, particularly those focused on Bayesian networks and their simplification techniques.

IttyBittyBit
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
Let's say we have a bayesian network G. Consider a subset A of this network consisting of a set of nodes and all the edges between them. Assume, for the sake of simplicity, that all nodes in A are binary (either true or false) and strongly anticorrelated i.e. if anyone of the nodes in A are true, the probability of any other nodes in A being true is close to zero.

It seems it should be possible to 'approximate' A by replacing it with a single non-binary node with multiple states, each state representing one of the former binary nodes being true (and one state correspending to the occurrence where none of them were true). I want to know if this is a common technique and, if so, what kind of approximation error bounds can be expected. Of course in the general case this might be a bit complicated but I would also be interested in any specialized cases (such as the case where the probability function of each node can be separated into the product of functions of each of the nodes).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, since no one seems to have answered, what about the converse scenario? I.e. 'reducing' a many-state node into several binary nodes?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K