Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the implications of librarian Jeffrey Beall's decision to unpublished his blog, which was known for listing predatory journals. Participants express concerns about the "International Journal of Quantum Foundations" and whether it qualifies as a predatory journal, alongside considerations of archiving Beall's list and the potential risks involved.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question the status of the "International Journal of Quantum Foundations" and whether it is predatory, noting its absence from recognized databases like Thompson Reuters.
- There is mention of the Internet Wayback Machine as a resource for accessing Beall's blog and the journal in question.
- One participant expresses uncertainty about the journal's credibility, describing it as "iffy" and not being an expert in the field.
- Another participant states that the journal is not acceptable according to their standards and emphasizes its classification as an "Open internet journal."
- Concerns are raised about the potential risks of archiving Beall's list on the forum, with a suggestion that a "white" list may be more beneficial than a "black" list.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that the "International Journal of Quantum Foundations" is not recognized by established standards, but there is no consensus on whether it is definitively predatory. The discussion about archiving Beall's list reveals differing opinions on the risks and benefits involved.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the lack of clarity on the criteria for what constitutes a predatory journal and the implications of Beall's unpublished blog on the ongoing evaluation of journals.