Beam Splitter Inputs and Commutting Modes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the commutation relations of input mode operators in a beam splitter setup, specifically examining the operators defined as ##\hat{A} = \frac{i\pi}{4}\hat{a}_0^{\dagger}\hat{a}_1## and ##\hat{C} = \frac{-i\pi}{4}\hat{a}_0\hat{a}_1^{\dagger}##. The primary inquiry is whether these operators commute, which is essential for decomposing the beam splitter operator ##\hat{B} = e^{\frac{i\pi}{4}(\hat{a}_0^{\dagger}\hat{a}_1 - \hat{a}_0\hat{a}_1^{\dagger})}## using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff relation. The conclusion emphasizes the need to verify the commutation relations between operators with different subscripts, as they are expected to commute but require confirmation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum optics principles
  • Familiarity with beam splitter operations
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators
  • Proficiency in the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff relation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the commutation relations of creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics
  • Study the properties of beam splitter operators in quantum optics
  • Explore the implications of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff relation in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the behavior of different input modes in beam splitter configurations
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate researchers in quantum optics, physicists studying beam splitter configurations, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics.

BeyondBelief96
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
[Not really Homework, but for my research] Background: I am an undergrad doing research in quantum optics, and studying different output states from various inputs into a 50:50 Beam splitter

Question: Do the two annihilation and creation operators of different input ports commute or do they obey the well-known commutation relation ##[\hat{a}, \hat{a}^{\dagger}] = 1##

I guess I'm having trouble distinguishing modes and inputs of a beam splitter. Can two separate input ports be of the same mode, or are they different modes? How do the field operators for those two inputs commute with each other?

The reason I need to know this is because I am trying to decompose the Beam Splitter Operator

## \hat{B} = e^{\frac{i\pi}{4}(\hat{a}_0^{\dagger}\hat{a}_1 - \hat{a}_0\hat{a}_1^{\dagger})} ##

Using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff Relation:

## e^{\hat{A} + \hat{C}} = e^{\hat{A}} e^{\hat{C}}e^{-\frac{1}{2}[\hat{A},\hat{C}]} ##

if and only if ## [\hat{A},\hat{C}] ## also commutes with ## \hat{A} ## and ## \hat{C} ##
Relevant Equations
## [\hat{a}, \hat{a}^{\dagger}] = 1 ##
My thinking so far is that if the two different input mode operators of a beam splitter commute, but I can't really give any good reasoning behind it.

I defined ##\hat{A} = \frac{i\pi}{4}\hat{a}_0^{\dagger}\hat{a}_1 ##

and

##\hat{C} = \frac{-i\pi}{4}\hat{a}_0\hat{a}_1^{\dagger} ##

and am trying to figure out the commutation relation between these two operators. I am stuck however because I when calculating this I am not sure if I can swap operators around or not of the different modes 0 and 1, where 0 and 1 are two different inputs of the beam splitter.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
BeyondBelief96 said:
Homework Statement:: [Not really Homework, but for my research] Background: I am an undergrad doing research in quantum optics, and studying different output states from various inputs into a 50:50 Beam splitter

Question: Do the two annihilation and creation operators of different input ports commute or do they obey the well-known commutation relation ##[\hat{a}, \hat{a}^{\dagger}] = 1##

I guess I'm having trouble distinguishing modes and inputs of a beam splitter. Can two separate input ports be of the same mode, or are they different modes? How do the field operators for those two inputs commute with each other?

The reason I need to know this is because I am trying to decompose the Beam Splitter Operator

## \hat{B} = e^{\frac{i\pi}{4}(\hat{a}_0^{\dagger}\hat{a}_1 - \hat{a}_0\hat{a}_1^{\dagger})} ##

Using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff Relation:

## e^{\hat{A} + \hat{C}} = e^{\hat{A}} e^{\hat{C}}e^{-\frac{1}{2}[\hat{A},\hat{C}]} ##

if and only if ## [\hat{A},\hat{C}] ## also commutes with ## \hat{A} ## and ## \hat{C} ##
Relevant Equations:: ## [\hat{a}, \hat{a}^{\dagger}] = 1 ##

My thinking so far is that if the two different input mode operators of a beam splitter commute, but I can't really give any good reasoning behind it.

I defined ##\hat{A} = \frac{i\pi}{4}\hat{a}_0^{\dagger}\hat{a}_1 ##

and

##\hat{C} = \frac{-i\pi}{4}\hat{a}_0\hat{a}_1^{\dagger} ##

and am trying to figure out the commutation relation between these two operators. I am stuck however because I when calculating this I am not sure if I can swap operators around or not of the different modes 0 and 1, where 0 and 1 are two different inputs of the beam splitter.
You need first to find out what the commutation relations are between the operators with subscript 0 and the operators with subscripts 1. I would expect them to commute but you should check that first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K